Received: from mail-vk0-f58.google.com ([209.85.213.58]:57291) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eExsH-00069M-9X for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 05:37:07 -0800 Received: by mail-vk0-f58.google.com with SMTP id t3sf8611339vke.15 for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 05:37:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=IgNU0FUnYG+aVMZ5FiBXBwWZNrPsSv/0V+lYBvsk8gI=; b=a9CrQbSOV/RwBuKJXOMdR9wfauGtANcU9wj//RiOiyNPjFxxLifCPdzFDGSAJLSY0L 4CZ6015s9/SAWLBxCT/SS8T0f19PjOHwSHKUO3+sRAga2/a3xMRZBWUIGdu4O+wWafcH nkSqaOjN8u0uhlMUKABV7OTmmRKv7raCquCgzerWrEuz4/Zr3DJdPC/TyDiT1YbBbNds cboSqiePdMKLfbLhHxoMNRSwDV2ZbFvELmP5fTpNg1rWt/Eea/kKKVwyLtWxi/u6Ivka hufxmmOBCnwLES7sbBfrw6LJM9LbOVtsgFrarDiquvbb+cv8BPKdSOhnKfZ2LKGvI3ZZ uooQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=IgNU0FUnYG+aVMZ5FiBXBwWZNrPsSv/0V+lYBvsk8gI=; b=C4Y9ezskI+6Zj/75hBrV+IYfH6O8+ZAEKupo3hD0uh7NVkVq0g0XuBWFo3gmpt3xU1 f0nHx4+CUL+0K92QQbILcevPw8NO2CwEYd3yQ266pGhReb1ADLJCafZ9gWvO/C+BwKmX 2nsJ3jFPm0yhjpKe8YPz3GvURXGWxUDo/yIDWrpfp0Omfhkgdv75tpGOfVdlzto2x1uA 2L1lun2wYUkgC1BqAMIwxXPO6fnopS201Wi9EjRK4krTMBhpaocjYr9Nt1hSLPta3eib rDfiRGpnPvGh92mu3s/LaxBv+MpXotfnBPXGIHXzTMLAVsMDZzGXU/cKx0pUqAcgK9pc VzUw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=sender:x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=IgNU0FUnYG+aVMZ5FiBXBwWZNrPsSv/0V+lYBvsk8gI=; b=FD5tnrhhWqRKRrsVhM++PLRGgAkhXp8KYF9JLBin41cZJ5KiIZzWY8BFzCxGpiSZoF tih8KFsgxixOk5jhBeOFVQQc2mN2GdKi2s0OifwVaerH+Ss4gYD8Nmo7fgezUGxCbznA wmGPDjDY4Y6viXG/VPSs0riyxXuB2zPgXtGOjtoWRaJ0XX3fkfnsP2VwLmxPvGuzOL0N duKkLDDCzmcWhuHrQ+3VGf/P750UWOCudafffK8Vgzj4DI4tfbE1GXQQ0TQv/96F34dR i4C9mIR79KXUHxupcex1xzbvL1yUutT+Jq1TwYNYm9Aj19Pvq3yYCCU6TnvLHungwOEM SH1A== Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4dYfpWtJKZPDFm2Z8tCLBEg9Q4C5EIoW2rtRDiWoAKTerpoBxd m86hRggEjsFlVhIsWKX6Z4U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+Rilcgq0XlCSuq1pfbAZ8UsYmsL8ve7/CnNls8/IZQy5xkcNAO/GbvhKA2V+Pub7reNTUiSAg== X-Received: by 10.31.168.133 with SMTP id r127mr2090852vke.8.1510753018764; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 05:36:58 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.31.21.72 with SMTP id 69ls8891242vkv.17.gmail; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 05:36:58 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.31.189.69 with SMTP id n66mr255664vkf.6.1510753017921; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 05:36:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 05:36:57 -0800 (PST) From: sukender1@gmail.com To: lojban Message-Id: <9acdeb52-885b-4ed6-b52b-7146d9cc73bf@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References: <78156dc5-1fb3-4e9d-992c-a8f30facc4fd@googlegroups.com> <963393d6-a9f1-4232-be13-b4ee76eb69e1@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: CLL and modern Lojban MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_5750_1188811317.1510753017796" X-Original-Sender: sukender1@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_bar: - ------=_Part_5750_1188811317.1510753017796 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_5751_1412173698.1510753017796" ------=_Part_5751_1412173698.1510753017796 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > It is not clear to me if 2nd and 3rd ideas would break up *many* things >> (thus forcing to "re-learn" when having learned CLL 1.1), or only details. >> Somebody has clues on this? >> > > > How do 2.3. necessarily conflict with 1.? > Well, it is linked to what timoteios told about backward-compatibility. So yes, you're right. There may be "non breaking" changes. But I guess that 2. and 3. are not 100% free of breaking changes. Don't you think? Or maybe the situation is to be looked at from a different angle (regarding to the impact of changes)? Furthermore, what is an "acceptable" breaking change is very subtle and subjective. Examples: - Changing details about maths may affect more engineers and researchers than others. - Beginners will be less impacted by breaking changes than long-standing speakers. I have personally read the whole CLL 1.1 and learned with it. However I'm still a beginner and the impact of changes is rather low for me (for now...). - Changing details about attidudinals may affect more Asian-languages native speakers than European-languages ones (not sure of that, but sounds reasonable). - (and surely much more...) > There are several levels of deviation from CLL: > https://jbotcan.org/lojban/en/dialects/ (which ignores internal conflicts > of CLL, which is your group 2.). > E.g. > krtisfrank's connectives > are a Dialect, > type 2. > xorxe's connectives are probably a Dialect, type 3. > solpahi's connectives are a Dialect, type 4. > > Thanks for the info. I guess those "types" are closely related to the "level" of breaking changes, but are not the same. What to you think about this? Finally, maybe that "level" could be evaluated with a "grid" (ie. multiple "grades" about various impact topics), being *unique for all submissions*. For example: - How much does it change the grammar? (ex: 0/5, 1/5...) - How much does it change existing words? - How much does it increase the vocabulary (word count)? - How close new words/rules are to existing ones? - (etc.) This may help reviewing, by allowing *only* low global grades. Just my 2 cents on this point! ;) la .sykyndyr. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_5751_1412173698.1510753017796 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It is not clear to me if 2nd and 3rd ideas= would break up many things (thus forcing to "re-learn&q= uot; when having learned CLL 1.1), or only details. Somebody has clues on t= his?


How do 2.3.= necessarily conflict with 1.?
Well, it is linked to what timoteios told about backward-compat= ibility. So yes, you're right. There may be "non breaking" ch= anges. But I guess that 2. and 3. are not 100% free of breaking changes. Do= n't you think? Or maybe the situation is to be looked at from a differe= nt angle (regarding to the impact of changes)?

Fur= thermore, what is an "acceptable" breaking change is very subtle = and subjective. Examples:
  • Changing details about mat= hs may affect more engineers and researchers than others.
  • Begin= ners will be less impacted by breaking changes than long-standing speakers.= I have personally read the whole CLL 1.1 and learned with it. However I= 9;m still a beginner and the impact of changes is rather low for me (for no= w...).
  • Changing details about attidudinals may affect more Asia= n-languages native speakers than European-languages ones (not sure of that,= but sounds reasonable).
  • (and surely much more...)
<= /div>
=C2=A0
There are several = levels of deviation from CLL:=C2=A0https://jbotcan.org/lojban/en/dialects/ (which ignores intern= al conflicts of CLL, which is your group 2.).=C2=A0
E.g.=C2= =A0
krtisfrank's connectives=C2= =A0are a Dialect, type 2.
xorxe's connectives are probably a = Dialect, type 3.
solpahi's connectives are a Dialect, type 4.=


Tha= nks for the info. I guess those "types" are closely related to th= e "level" of breaking changes, but are not the same.
Wh= at to you think about this?

Finally, maybe that &q= uot;level" could be evaluated with a "grid" (ie. multiple &q= uot;grades" about various impact topics), being unique for all s= ubmissions. For example:
  • How much does it cha= nge the grammar? (ex: 0/5, 1/5...)
  • How much does it change existing= words?
  • How much does it increase the vocabulary (word count)?
  • =
  • How close new words/rules are to existing ones?
  • (etc.)
This may help reviewing, by allowing only=C2=A0lo= w global grades.
Just my 2 cents on this point! ;)

=
la .sykyndyr.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http= s://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_5751_1412173698.1510753017796-- ------=_Part_5750_1188811317.1510753017796--