Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of greg_g@posteo.net designates 185.67.36.141 as permitted sender) client-ip=185.67.36.141;
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: CLL and modern Lojban
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
References: <ef141db1-9811-4d44-8458-972ddffdd883@googlegroups.com>
 <78156dc5-1fb3-4e9d-992c-a8f30facc4fd@googlegroups.com>
 <SY3PR01MB0873C992D556B090F308980EEB510@SY3PR01MB0873.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com>
 <CACf3dPnmCuGXQtxQOOrP9T9pDthhthx3rnoCdaFoai+fM8M6Wg@mail.gmail.com>
 <SY3PR01MB08733806D926A36CF1726EB0EB560@SY3PR01MB0873.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com>
 <CACf3dPncGvkjQjbxL4MV_omG0R-e66V1CDcZFrt2hVU8iYWf0w@mail.gmail.com>
 <963393d6-a9f1-4232-be13-b4ee76eb69e1@googlegroups.com>
 <e7d4a3d5-4cd9-435d-bd3f-90c011172a10@googlegroups.com>
 <A9240133-B357-4747-941D-BF28F3CCAE8C@free.fr>
 <eb1c7ed2-ec39-476d-b9dc-11f835e9623c@googlegroups.com>
 <ae9b9cae-0420-475b-a0e8-8efb3452ef1e@googlegroups.com>
 <7d063690-0550-45d6-9779-3334ac8e17b5@googlegroups.com>
 <e3a723d2-8b62-4338-bc8a-147f03d6d3f4@googlegroups.com>
From: Gregorio Guidi <greg_g@posteo.net>
Message-ID: <4aefe693-e504-4518-09e5-d82a360c333c@posteo.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 22:10:19 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <e3a723d2-8b62-4338-bc8a-147f03d6d3f4@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_bar: --

On 11/21/2017 03:08 PM, sukender1@gmail.com wrote:
> ***
>
> @all:
> Now about submissions to update the CLL... Let's imagine a second we 
> have an unique and active board (say "LLGBPFKCoders", or whatever), 
> and adequate tools. What would be an efficient submission protocol? 
> Here are two drafts:
>
> [...]
>
> That's even simpler, but removes the ability to make tiny changes once 
> validated. What's your opinion?
>

The community should be able to send pull requests with proposed changes 
to the CLL. The LLG, as owner of the CLL, should appoint a recognized 
member of the community as release manager in charge of the official 
repository, with the power to accept/reject patches, set a roadmap and 
make releases (CLL 1.2, 1.3, 2.0, ...).

Just my 2 cents.

mi'e la .greg.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.