Received: from mail-wm0-f56.google.com ([74.125.82.56]:45399) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eK7gy-0008ME-Mm for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 11:06:46 -0800 Received: by mail-wm0-f56.google.com with SMTP id w74sf1840442wmf.0 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 11:06:44 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1511982398; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=kKdez4sC/PZMDVbD2RIyTXaHN1ZxVJWLoyg7Fcr4CgyBo3quCBs5Cu0XJ1axUXDLfa Nsr0NwlimOMjmoaO9cIkrW9/FijVurB9Qpt83T6PfzG/nLq9d8dPUo0zPEnGmg/J2Jij 3VQvDxGXU/Y26UQWXnBpYE0CuuyWA9ZdTL8o5fPN5nGV6MiBUhgdLu9kpjyGTMscwxbr nTUUv1Kf0+VJMlJ+4FSO6hFW28C9ISqS59nTBOYOc5UQ5xZF/Gmiu46pkTVVFkoJTMDo B9mFLICE+wmd4I75T5MyhTRZ6wuy0cD/7A/gszIRj9T11UJNu++hED1kfT3Qkmf6ZTv5 RRSw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-help:list-post :list-id:mailing-list:precedence:reply-to:to:subject:message-id:date :from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:arc-authentication-results :arc-message-signature:sender:dkim-signature:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=OIpZW+vDXeT8cy7j/tyVDNsikUwAx6/dXuQMK05osI0=; b=vmAAeqn2BY3iYlqq3ozLv2gUP/xbD9e+G/yFEfLHQV7y47bRGxzH0UhNjf6A2sAaWE lJj7XuSGd3kyQsF/M1kt6bwEVmLzbqGH6/39qE0LVj+XKnearAhXI+0KotB+aTipaSvq MGIS2GkzfZWbI45usctE+BhhBCXBompSEdFzy4iso8gko7IizaaFf4qZnlUZV6Va1J4Y i22evb7XURa6yFyWR/MlhJKFN7iX0E1UweWGX3FnD4qlfluNEx+tH4iXgHA4P4Yx362h Ti33XHiKHz2xrlPabdTRAVl3VIO4bDvNGVl5BI2yh/d8ktb7goMYmZDmKnbUPv/XAyfw OsyA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=piuGemiF; spf=pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c0c::235 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=and.rosta@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20161025; h=sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=OIpZW+vDXeT8cy7j/tyVDNsikUwAx6/dXuQMK05osI0=; b=pv9d4I6eJ+RER5hJrp0YA2Gi84QxfN0Gv/OL8ml5U3hyD5J8wYeKtIT5xMy6xcc3Sy /eqh7TYdS+Zonq1jYYY8QTtXA/SHachMG23kL0oAEh7pMkuZ2mK2+k4i3i08yGXscpYK f9t5a7Rx5tj+RptkytiRZA95ixf4uanSsszmDKK7M5OR4eUoPAsk4sNMU5TT1kxHWEYp hHbER3R7Ue8y5p9LVYCqNhakp+lN3RfnhnHNYG/xNsU5ecgVkaDKpyjfNXR2m1/EYEyX vnH0/SlWQqEcVXSgQqCDHDUcytg/cDMTjkaYUZez9riLd+b8XYqFFwiARnjOEr9ir4Ii PB9Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=OIpZW+vDXeT8cy7j/tyVDNsikUwAx6/dXuQMK05osI0=; b=ejpB2fYpo/nbB4N5ELs4lTDQIzgGt2/DQFdU63JyN7hbqVmdZsEiISg1oreno/Up/N yvSrVfuNDBOsgYiSjLBDx/jmzgaIRoswJx58namb70v1CWvQi93+R1nLa8GevvuQnL8B ecp4XVfbkRQPk6YxZ85RDu01MT7zRel2hVwTH69sE+rXPejKb2FVpbp/bWGhaPvGfAxb KCOyVSMaQi71IxPk12aclDiD2pV0O5ZtA8+ONCwzZRHu1hbqjSwSfcUmOE3jCgufmObh usVy3lfiseEcKyGmVK0kqXhFhertsA0eE1GksqnvpAWjpp1aSVzWQPN7yLtIKlyBS0Rw c7IA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=sender:x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=OIpZW+vDXeT8cy7j/tyVDNsikUwAx6/dXuQMK05osI0=; b=Mo5n9WOC+M2hhtH7lCw/FL3ygznlCgfA8Jg6+RFrILcEfhbLKwkpiljwea8LMarknZ fVB6wT53ChFT8iLWb3WXU/LqIFfRFmnh8UbVOIU2bS4XFWLbUIRGgsSsUgEeFQAgYgux eemCDEpd0zDyPdzGyu6R7IUaFgLttNIpl1dyDKd22tp4AcTWdJ6H5nnH2cfPqIal9tEs 9Gn6GULOGRwZhwZefNpvR4MX3MP0cX6l0jUyJ3O9bd7uWtj/N5PDaX54i2PTr/tzK4Kp Dd0AKGxRktz1O5B2+V/pmY3MF7f7yfNkVCjRw7J4d6QhAxebDFeZSKalT706vk6VDqkV jlkA== Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6ktthti8NJfSgmDwbrae1MSnYWF139lCXggiVAsme5jHXIiE57 uP/Fll3E58I0xr49k3MlqTU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYG4gco6NC8u8mwMY7l28RsPP49xfuvnY6wY+OrUdnH+VoGlqv/6FkGJ9BeCoHm+d0M3wbVow== X-Received: by 10.28.199.8 with SMTP id x8mr83426wmf.1.1511982398005; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 11:06:38 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.80.179.211 with SMTP id t19ls8448338edd.3.gmail; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 11:06:37 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.80.203.138 with SMTP id k10mr1991587edi.5.1511982397431; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 11:06:37 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1511982397; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=w5cNBXVRPlnctrGhvy5vVMhHQ3vOQ3sT7KCObcgTfPaFFUCEveUWoH5sSYEn8uZz9S Rljh461AUlWgNhzHp7VdR0enzbwN016ZBnU+WZqh+hOPio5qO7teui+g02KjTfUdGXx5 +Zal71dro7pwuT2+WPRL2sFVGWyNfjWhWoTazikdjLh91ysbxbnxFhfSKWqXIRp+jefx feCPRaTSZME3ho8lDZtyiresCjCpD5+GIo4wSRWa36pTBnw9taeqjK3GZUGPCywLT9tr maOajXimwBx0oEOkoL+9VT06V56J9D1Hn6iUQD/Mj6HeaVYqrzM3JfBH/kK9zKyuBWrI 8rBQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=gcxD1+hMac1pSB2lkJy30VI2q+eyJZyyep/GZrysmwk=; b=LeuVx9gLtbWHC5ESUt9wB59TtGxJtRcKKN0gOduU46XFcVtmdY4VArvsQVj200lecV fZckZClYvAugCtF6/VuRX4go9H0PSSgxT8LOd7wG8606xfSqBRYwvvtyBy2+1m0iNIUB eElE304g2DKW+pqcxe80v0GSWBfZePy8I5QsnTG/7x3oVt3seXPYaRT55bGORX4b6Mj1 khHeA3fbXT1ogACxY9X2qiR9KLEG9nCeiODmd6M3F80GvuTptvCS1BWbd7Hqz5MaZg69 fIfyb56EZr8Dcd70JmbZ1wzrsXqY4xylhE440U/rND51gUAajPDpgj6KJmVzkGqUQIy/ l5Kw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=piuGemiF; spf=pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c0c::235 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=and.rosta@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: from mail-wr0-x235.google.com (mail-wr0-x235.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c0c::235]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h45si115538eda.2.2017.11.29.11.06.37 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Nov 2017 11:06:37 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c0c::235 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c0c::235; Received: by mail-wr0-x235.google.com with SMTP id z18so4383590wrb.8 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 11:06:37 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.223.195.113 with SMTP id e46mr3559232wrg.149.1511982396844; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 11:06:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.148.3 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 11:06:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4333e9b5-ac2e-4011-b717-7c98c491b9c1@googlegroups.com> References: <8929082b-8275-4e7b-b759-939361737a1e@googlegroups.com> <4333e9b5-ac2e-4011-b717-7c98c491b9c1@googlegroups.com> From: And Rosta Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 19:06:36 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] The Wizard of Oz To: lojban@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045c3988abae19055f23d523" X-Original-Sender: and.rosta@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=piuGemiF; spf=pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c0c::235 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=and.rosta@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- --f403045c3988abae19055f23d523 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 29 November 2017 at 16:05, wrote: > And, > > As I read it, xorlo "le" and "la" are pretty much the same as in CLL, > except for default quantification. > In CLL around 6.2.6 I understand that a name (a cmene or a la sumti) is a= n > arbitrary identifier, attached to something by the act of naming, instead > of by reference to dictionary meanings and observation. > > `` The last descriptor of this section is =E2=80=9Cla=E2=80=9D, which ind= icates that the > selbri which follows it has been dissociated from its normal meaning and = is > being used as a name. Like =E2=80=9Cle=E2=80=9D descriptions, =E2=80=9Cla= =E2=80=9D descriptions are > implicitly restricted to those I have in mind. '' > > In the original translation of "the Cowardly Lion" as "la tolvirnu cinfo"= , > for example, this identification is used because the critter is cowardly > and he is a lion, it's not some kind of CB handle. > None of the "la" expressions I'm concerned about ever get used with a > vocative. > They are descriptive phrases that seem to me to be very standard cases fo= r > using "le". > We should write "le xamgu termakfyfetsi", "le smani", "le rijno cutci", > etc. > > Is there a variety of lojban where this is not the case? > We can see from the capitalization that "Cowardly Lion" is a name; it may or may not be etymologically aptronymous, and even if it is aptronymous, the underlying description, "cowardly lion", is only the reason for why that phrase became CL's name and is not the name itself. And if the names are not used vocatively, that just suggests that the name is applied by the narrator and not by the characters. That was as far as the thinking behind my original reply got. It now also occurs to me that "la tolvirnu cinfo" doesn't distinguish between "Cowardly Lion" and "the Cowardly Lion", but I can't think of how that English distinction, whose semantic import (if there is any) is not at all apparent to me, might be rendered in Lojban. "Le tolvirnu cinfo" is, of course, not a name; and it is well to remember that "le" may be glossed "a(n)" just as well as "the", so it's as if CL were constantly referred to as "a cowardly lion", which is something nobody but Jaqen H'ghar would do. "le" primarily encodes specificity whereas English names (not even those of "the X" sort) don't. It's interesting to wonder what translation would have been suitable had the original not been a name, and if instead the character were simply always referred to as "the cowardly lion": the main semantic ingredient contributed by the "the" then would be the definiteness. "lo bi'u nai tolvirnu cinfo" captures the definiteness but of course foregrounds it too much, and probably "lo tolvirnu cinfo" would be the best rendition. What motivated me to make my original response was not just that "le tolvirnu cinfo" is very inferior to "la tolvirnu cinfo" as a rendition of the English but also that it was a change inflicted on somebody else's translation and furthermore was inflicted on it as if it were a correction rather than an incorrection. --And. > > la bremenli > > On Monday, November 27, 2017 at 2:20:30 AM UTC-8, And Rosta wrote: >> >> >> >> On 26 Nov 2017 16:36, wrote: >> >> >> One substantive global kind of change was made. >> Among all the uses of "la", there were many cases where it is followed b= y >> a verb phrase, and where the expression is not at all a name, but a >> description, for example "la tolvirnu cinfo". >> All such non-names got "la" replaced with "le". >> >> >> >> That looks a deleterious change, unless post-xorlo "le" has been >> completely redefined from what it formerly was. The original "la" captur= es >> properly the English, whereas semitraditional "le" does not at all. (By >> "semitraditional" I mean to exclude the habitual solecistic misuse that >> prevailed in early Lojban writing, where "le" was used as the default >> gadri, with sillinesses such as "le nu".) >> >> --And. >> >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > Virus-free. www.avg.com <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --f403045c3988abae19055f23d523 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On 29 November 2017 at 16:05, <vpbroman@gmail.com> wro= te:
And,

As I rea= d it, xorlo "le" and "la" are pretty much the same as i= n CLL, except for default quantification.
In CLL around 6.2.6 I understa= nd that a name (a cmene or a la sumti) is an arbitrary identifier, attached= to something by the act of naming, instead of by reference to dictionary m= eanings and observation.

`` The last descriptor of this section is = =E2=80=9Cla=E2=80=9D, which indicates that the selbri which follows it has = been dissociated from its normal meaning and is being used as a name. Like = =E2=80=9Cle=E2=80=9D descriptions, =E2=80=9Cla=E2=80=9D descriptions are im= plicitly restricted to those I have in mind. ''

In the origi= nal translation of "the Cowardly Lion" as "la tolvirnu cinfo= ", for example, this identification is used because the critter is cow= ardly and he is a lion, it's not some kind of CB handle.
None of the= "la" expressions I'm concerned about ever get used with a vo= cative.
They are descriptive phrases that seem to me to be very standard= cases for using "le".
We should write "le xamgu termakfy= fetsi", "le smani", "le rijno cutci", etc.

= Is there a variety of lojban where this is not the case?

We can see from the capitalization that "Cowar= dly Lion" is a name; it may or may not be etymologically aptronymous, = and even if it is aptronymous, the underlying description, "cowardly l= ion", is only the reason for why that phrase became CL's name and = is not the name itself. And if the names are not used vocatively, that just= suggests that the name is applied by the narrator and not by the character= s. That was as far as the thinking behind my original reply got. It now als= o occurs to me that "la tolvirnu cinfo" doesn't distinguish b= etween "Cowardly Lion" and "the Cowardly Lion", but I c= an't think of how that English distinction, whose semantic import (if t= here is any) is not at all apparent to me, might be rendered in Lojban. &qu= ot;Le tolvirnu cinfo" is, of course, not a name; and it is well to rem= ember that "le" may be glossed "a(n)" just as well as &= quot;the", so it's as if CL were constantly referred to as "a= cowardly lion", which is something nobody but Jaqen H'ghar would = do. "le" primarily encodes specificity whereas English names (not= even those of "the X" sort) don't.=C2=A0

It's interesting to wonder what translation would have been suita= ble had the original not been a name, and if instead the character were sim= ply always referred to as "the cowardly lion": the main semantic = ingredient contributed by the "the" then would be the definitenes= s. "lo bi'u nai tolvirnu cinfo" captures the definiteness but= of course foregrounds it too much, and probably "lo tolvirnu cinfo&qu= ot; would be the best rendition.

What motivated me= to make my original response was not just that "le tolvirnu cinfo&quo= t; is very inferior to "la tolvirnu cinfo" as a rendition of the = English but also that it was a change inflicted on somebody else's tran= slation and furthermore was inflicted on it as if it were a correction rath= er than an incorrection.

--And.

=C2=A0

la b= remenli

On Monday, November 27, 2017 at 2:20:30 AM UTC-8, And Rosta = wrote:


On 26 Nov 2017 16:36, &= lt;vpbr...@gmail.com> wrote:

One substantive global kind of change wa= s made.
Among all the uses of "la", there were many cases wher= e it is followed by a verb phrase, and where the expression is not at all a= name, but a description, for example "la tolvirnu cinfo".
All= such non-names got "la" replaced with "le".
<= /blockquote>


That looks a deleterious change, unless post-x= orlo "le" has been completely redefined from what it formerly was= . The original "la" captures properly the English, whereas semitr= aditional "le" does not at all. (By "semitraditional" I= mean to exclude the habitual solecistic misuse that prevailed in early Loj= ban writing, where "le" was used as the default gadri, with silli= nesses such as "le nu".)

--And.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


= Virus-free. www.avg.com

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http= s://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--f403045c3988abae19055f23d523--