Received: from mail-yb1-f189.google.com ([209.85.219.189]:55540) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jNMUL-0007Yy-2Z for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 13:12:27 -0700 Received: by mail-yb1-f189.google.com with SMTP id 84sf6993504ybz.22 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 13:12:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=fvss1OkzGA+GhvDzY+x+elnxEruJcAdOskULtIm1TC4=; b=oM8mIuIhvIJdCabfJLnekrCBTLx8e5vn8lvM+1u6o+93IN8TeMJiJLRYE1tKCOVTOr uqHV12C3g8QrKdMMM5DYxWgMMDVWpckwyHMOANW4ddHRcfVjqbxJ9z8f64uDWGVXPaAx Lq76qS3JE6Urg2X8GBbvWMZpR+qMPaMUG5ZH0rAwKnlKKERXRkt2UcfpvOUeK7GJgxNR +jrebCzk+/RTGPMXCoYQiQR07c4tXHNalRJzu74jwwdW7Fdo7P6EM6NDmD4sbx+FA1rx yS3bcYNIbx/VlTjj/8aS2+YMjmhz9QHW/SjpTevLZV1RxmcCBqS+EvaHjM9AmSXtyG6f CbAQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=fvss1OkzGA+GhvDzY+x+elnxEruJcAdOskULtIm1TC4=; b=Eqrvo76yA/fctZToLgygEMbKBeobOjORXZpoD1deVFXsLLFonHY72ZG9iuMgIcpVZF wXRd8Y0hK2yHWrmVY2LdiUbrvmW3vlWpudRnK5k/WC4fK3fbCR1gIM0YNNX3H7eY1bZm Q3e03hjEzSF2Udc64BcDooO5zjIbFxlpbEJR2YRq7nl+47P6mW+HtC7Yh2Sk8rouGuhu apaC721bQAeYs7YFDcnPOmZ7y5UrX6gix8MsGjXZUHM69NzOdIwt4PNeID5U3RnG0+nV vmH8GfjRue6iVEYGzrSmMeJZg78JufUjYlQN5SxoV5ubvjlVJDcJhmE3KDChBk7xbOUL mASg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=sender:x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=fvss1OkzGA+GhvDzY+x+elnxEruJcAdOskULtIm1TC4=; b=ieeY9ZfMF69CmJG5Fxljte761TasXdJ0EyIHMg9U1w47qX9HewLRo2I9K2Ckfi57cV jCqLlltAaN3LvN/hWa4Fw087rWI9Xma8IxpdFvKVZeYnGBvU1qvoc+R0QTXyNlguzac6 Dm7cgtrt67PyHEa4iZlyQUX95AhhAycm5VOS2oLYW9ZhzX0AIDyW0V66Rzx+GEgS6SIt iEvhgvw5dVqYFyzXo5XDg1XdERumIEqy2WZ7vj5TJeFWY7U7Ty1qmxjsALPKIlV9m9Mr QChV1OeSOTcjdgtaUrA7cwh3yJnRtoSLft47+6zJf9/HpJr3k5C2XJxVV9MSZ70cFcmw E6xA== Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubFbViA6HQ6x6+84i08yK6YkvHknQL7e1KSrmad1hTf4PI9u0u7 2RhqrJNWEjG25S+M2j3FaYs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypK01LWtjM4zdKbiln08ZMM4zWfk58ad+dwaZAjC90TtzTan4AtdQkMweAXy46L3Q9iLKnl5Mg== X-Received: by 2002:a25:d2cb:: with SMTP id j194mr15933849ybg.212.1586635938488; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 13:12:18 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:a25:25d4:: with SMTP id l203ls6793808ybl.3.gmail; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 13:12:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a25:2fc7:: with SMTP id v190mr17096910ybv.9.1586635937538; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 13:12:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 13:12:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Gleki Arxokuna To: lojban Message-Id: <6fe62be6-21b6-40b7-98b6-0f4e0072df47@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References: <18776223.2757089.1586622570213.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <18776223.2757089.1586622570213@mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] Why Lojban fails MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_856_1951708676.1586635936854" X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_bar: -- ------=_Part_856_1951708676.1586635936854 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_857_4658207.1586635936854" ------=_Part_857_4658207.1586635936854 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Em s=C3=A1bado, 11 de abril de 2020 21:39:56 UTC+3, uakci escreveu: > > I would=E2=80=99ve agreed, but neither logic nor linguistics are alchemy. > But spoken fopl or swh might be. (Controlled parsable semantically unambiguous English is a thing anyway and= =20 is in use unlike Lojban) =20 > Lojban has succeeded as a language that people use to communicate, but as= =20 > a project, it fails to meet the requirements as it stands now. From a=20 > bird=E2=80=99s-eye view, this might not be so apparent, but then you real= ize that=20 > so many little things are left undecided, like {ce=E2=80=99u} filling, ex= act=20 > semantics of FIhO, some grammatical quirks like {.y bu} and {zo .y}, and= =20 > the ever-present issue of overengineering=E2=80=A6 > > You could say that this is not a problem for Lojban, and I=E2=80=99d agre= e: not=20 > for Lojban as a language (or languages, since Lojban dialects tend to sol= ve=20 > these matters more elegantly and therefore amount to an advancement, not = a=20 > hindrance). But the overall project=E2=80=99s criteria have not yet been = met, and=20 > thus it is still ongoing, which raises the question of why one should car= e=20 > to believe in its completion provided that it=E2=80=99s over 30 years sin= ce it was=20 > founded. I, for one, prefer to stake my bets on a loglang project whose= =20 > development history =E2=80=94 track record =E2=80=94 and leadership do no= t foretell its=20 > eventual abandonment. > > =E2=80=94 M=E1=BB=89 H=E1=BB=8Fash=C4=AB j=C3=AD ka > > On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 at 19:54, Gleki Arxokuna = =20 > wrote: > >> Alchemists pursued what appeared to be nonexistent. Still they found a= =20 >> lot of gems during their research. >> >> So whatever goals Loglan or Lojban had in past it's fine in present as i= t=20 >> is. >> >> --=20 >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group= s=20 >> "lojban" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send a= n=20 >> email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion on the web visit=20 >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lojban/c29378ec-fcee-40c8-8c42-b0a807d= 85ddf%40googlegroups.com >> . >> > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/= lojban/6fe62be6-21b6-40b7-98b6-0f4e0072df47%40googlegroups.com. ------=_Part_857_4658207.1586635936854 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Em s=C3=A1bado, 11 de abril de 2020 21:39:56 UTC+3= , uakci escreveu:
I would=E2=80=99ve agreed, but neither logic nor linguistics are= alchemy.

But spoken fopl or sw= h might be.
(Controlled parsable semantically unambiguous English= is a thing anyway and is in use unlike Lojban)
=C2=A0
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;bord= er-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;">
Lojban = has succeeded as a language that people use to communicate, but as a projec= t, it fails to meet the requirements as it stands now. From a bird=E2=80=99= s-eye view, this might not be so apparent, but then you realize that so man= y little things are left undecided, like {ce=E2=80=99u} filling, exact sema= ntics of FIhO, some grammatical quirks like {.y bu} and {zo .y}, and the ev= er-present issue of overengineering=E2=80=A6

You could say that this is not a problem for Lojban, a= nd I=E2=80=99d agree: not for Lojban as a language (or languages, since Loj= ban dialects tend to solve these matters more elegantly and therefore amoun= t to an advancement, not a hindrance). But the overall project=E2=80=99s cr= iteria have not yet been met, and thus it is still ongoing, which raises th= e question of why one should care to believe in its completion provided tha= t it=E2=80=99s over 30 years since it was founded. I, for one, prefer to st= ake my bets on a loglang project whose development history =E2=80=94 track = record =E2=80=94 and leadership do not foretell its eventual abandonment.

=E2=80=94 M=E1=BB= =89 H=E1=BB=8Fash=C4=AB j=C3=AD ka

On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 at 19:54, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
Alchemists pursued what app= eared to be nonexistent. Still they found a lot of gems during their resear= ch.

So whatever goals Loglan or Lojban had in past it's fine in present as = it is.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lojban/c2= 9378ec-fcee-40c8-8c42-b0a807d85ddf%40googlegroups.com.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lo= jban/6fe62be6-21b6-40b7-98b6-0f4e0072df47%40googlegroups.com.
------=_Part_857_4658207.1586635936854-- ------=_Part_856_1951708676.1586635936854--