Received: from mail-yb1-f188.google.com ([209.85.219.188]:33770) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jNgRZ-0006QC-Tu for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 10:30:55 -0700 Received: by mail-yb1-f188.google.com with SMTP id v46sf9555261ybi.0 for ; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 10:30:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=R6CqzChN8gTEIQ/Sz9fvsZ2F8qPhA5fhXJCZzxPJCv0=; b=BZRwA92Ft/18i/0hOhSqQc02E9VtYsCB5v2bPdzAJ+AqoRVvLIAuz7yIN3P8KVBOTD 5TJTbqGzru/ZIT9EK9aWHXIjLQ1PQHFvO26mphlbliBd5cF1Grfvm8eBptBF4eAYxwdz g359T8lTfJrd9oRShnYsMrHN1sn1Pb5kON3a+WtM5ACkZ26CUzTdmyNvRTBsRYdTx4Ar OuvLqNcYk/juH6Y58/nSwJdgJSjTS7eY1ThKsV8duyangNt7sKQ8pFe0WyjbZjJm2mPl YcvGTBfd5elBw/nj/u4c9WL6kWC4fIMuvxvxictkgjpMIrE2qa3uYNgxXAaDfwYLrgGn Q4YQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=R6CqzChN8gTEIQ/Sz9fvsZ2F8qPhA5fhXJCZzxPJCv0=; b=GBaN0yrLGZCSxEX4OAmxHrU2j5ZJRiyJONGMJG0dZB1Icddm1JGtGiLP2xsYwmjCfQ zNbySdToxG2SIELbYCERjZrjxwuYRBgJZuhMRksQIpjzTIrraBesiLkmCe8Gi8VANcpD VfEB0IzSMulX6p8DyH72mvLHADLD/G6wWafKjbcrrDfyJv6ZsyJZNK70gUV6yESygJ9i dgo1DmFaM0TcG1M6IGq7bHxAdupWVEmp0Ag0VJKN50VRNjgPm6HE2+FpdrP+C+g5EOBP CIBSTOaRqrSqPoEkCtxGr9leFdEM/yS1PoEXODVtRZfn/AqpFxzW45c4ApOvj/X5RVWM Wdmg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=sender:x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=R6CqzChN8gTEIQ/Sz9fvsZ2F8qPhA5fhXJCZzxPJCv0=; b=hEv5dZeAEOF1+nfCGtXRfe3YhjtG5Tehykdt3WvL12TLxMwbtZFxeXqOUYGwjwhCV1 M5y2rjXlkTA4TyKff8oySrb8NgcB+xT5mkTrNjXfHpxaG8dVeyq+vk47rKR7jD0OzkVw xfJPogufGV84BSppJ4FrqDUJCBmbKWSyqivRW9t12gswkzUpO6a0xu59chx/12ET0mwG eGSZB7Y3UyWkkyWXAs+h0KRrrdvjdMCXqebmfyLfMUEuCm5I32LQDYsR2rWyeLBSUlOi of+Tt0ju5q0L0mXG6mfZIo/0prTZleaZkf3BBU+qnLfyqbaE1OsjQAjzbRW1yqW/yY7E RamA== Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYLjwoChouv0TuXMz1VXbnvRMiws4fuW+MFrTOjVo1Mgd42g3Rz YvJykwVbY04N+dWM3tc2iaQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLGgJjDaER2RbVhkxXwDX6tNuGsmur3B+95eDShr8Auqn8SjZYDKzAayV7rYq7XHT4H8+cyAw== X-Received: by 2002:a25:cc3:: with SMTP id 186mr19952399ybm.189.1586712647752; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 10:30:47 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:a25:ac26:: with SMTP id w38ls6505370ybi.11.gmail; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 10:30:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a25:2fc7:: with SMTP id v190mr22620128ybv.9.1586712646615; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 10:30:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2020 10:30:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Gleki Arxokuna To: lojban Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <18776223.2757089.1586622570213.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <18776223.2757089.1586622570213@mail.yahoo.com> <6fe62be6-21b6-40b7-98b6-0f4e0072df47@googlegroups.com> <8eb60e09-2aa3-4e14-b37e-f716ea06ecfe@googlegroups.com> <1137a1b7-cd6f-4c7c-b2cc-f38e8b4abb3f@googlegroups.com> <59cebb85-184c-49ed-9556-438ca75de05f@googlegroups.com> <110320343.2935330.1586699696926@mail.yahoo.com> <2b1d68cd-3777-486c-be81-01e084438dcb@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] Why Lojban fails MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_1151_985005132.1586712645964" X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_bar: -- ------=_Part_1151_985005132.1586712645964 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1152_168864898.1586712645965" ------=_Part_1152_168864898.1586712645965 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Em domingo, 12 de abril de 2020 19:44:25 UTC+3, Mike S. escreveu: > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 12:13 PM Gleki Arxokuna < > gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Em domingo, 12 de abril de 2020 18:01:38 UTC+3, Mike S. escreveu: >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 9:55 AM 'John E Clifford' via lojban < >>> lojban@googlegroups.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Oh, my! I merely meant to drop a friendly reminder that Lojban could= =20 >>>> not achieve its goal as presently constituted. KI learn (I=E2=80=99ve= been away a=20 >>>> while) Lojbanists (of some sort or other or maybe all) no longer car a= bout=20 >>>> its primary goal, monoparsing, but are concerned to make a viable lang= uage=20 >>>> out of the scraps. >>>> >>> >>> Do you have evidence that the Lojbanist community as a whole has=20 >>> abandoned the goal of "monoparsing" (which I take to mean self-segregat= ing=20 >>> morphology and unambiguous grammar)? =20 >>> >> >> I have one. When I asked about inconsistencies in the PEG grammar I was= =20 >> given an answer that some semantic parser should do that job. However, n= o=20 >> such parser was envisioned at that time. So yes, it's avoiding the topic= of=20 >> not abandoning it at all. >> > > This is your evidence that monoparsing has been abandoned? If monoparsin= g=20 > were abandoned, no one would be writing PEG grammars in the first place. = =20 > > From the time camxes was born there has been no progress. They all got=20 stuck in peg formalism and tinkering camxes.=20 > >> Even within ordinary AST system there are no discussions of internal=20 >> grammar of UI or fu'e. It's a topic for geeks maybe that's the reason. >> > > Or of PA. Meanwhile, it seems to me that BAI and FA and others could hav= e=20 > been combined. So yeah the syntactic categories could have been both spl= it=20 > and lumped differently.=20 > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/= lojban/bd26dffb-9842-43db-8566-4839e9450d8c%40googlegroups.com. ------=_Part_1152_168864898.1586712645965 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Em domingo, 12 de abril de 2020 19:44:25 UTC+3, Mi= ke S. escreveu:


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to
lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lo= jban/bd26dffb-9842-43db-8566-4839e9450d8c%40googlegroups.com.
------=_Part_1152_168864898.1586712645965-- ------=_Part_1151_985005132.1586712645964--