Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of scope845hlang343jbo@icebubble.org designates 2607:f2f8:a1d8::b19:0:f0b as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f2f8:a1d8::b19:0:f0b;
From: scope845hlang343jbo@icebubble.org
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: [lojban] Inconsistensies in PEG grammar and gismu frames (WAS: Re:
 Why Lojban fails)
References: <18776223.2757089.1586622570213.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
	<18776223.2757089.1586622570213@mail.yahoo.com>
	<c29378ec-fcee-40c8-8c42-b0a807d85ddf@googlegroups.com>
	<CACtk4+C8FqtmCh22YyPcRPiAecFLf8TuHkz8ru-JiHKbbjkceg@mail.gmail.com>
	<6fe62be6-21b6-40b7-98b6-0f4e0072df47@googlegroups.com>
	<CACtk4+BOX=1HLsDPpYnnF4F5udZYZW1L9n87bhWw6t4rwYzKhw@mail.gmail.com>
	<8eb60e09-2aa3-4e14-b37e-f716ea06ecfe@googlegroups.com>
	<CACtk4+CQVWmW8_=i-t4nT01vLg9QsXebhCYGip8NqkvyD6enhg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1137a1b7-cd6f-4c7c-b2cc-f38e8b4abb3f@googlegroups.com>
	<CACtk4+D0NF3ghV8wzD=oOv+ijrSiuNH3pgg5Ctn3JDMEO4nQxw@mail.gmail.com>
	<e00859fc-e0cf-44f2-9c1a-c6ae178f647e@googlegroups.com>
	<CACtk4+D7EusQg-W1=0d0919aGZgVKVO2043A4ogiostyWXM5fQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<59cebb85-184c-49ed-9556-438ca75de05f@googlegroups.com>
	<CACtk4+APMZbXATy1_xAUouvqxTiQr0sZ06x7XxmLJ-WBxVEWGQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<f1e41358-15f6-469a-9623-11725854d112@googlegroups.com>
	<CACtk4+BAaZMF31=UFTNLHFNM94dshpvf1hZP9q2axn+wQznfNg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 18:00:49 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CACtk4+BAaZMF31=UFTNLHFNM94dshpvf1hZP9q2axn+wQznfNg@mail.gmail.com>
	(uakci's message of "Sun, 12 Apr 2020 16:07:13 +0200")
Message-ID: <86h7xnb6zy.fsf_-_@cmarib.ramside>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
X-Spam_score: -1.7
X-Spam_score_int: -16
X-Spam_bar: -

Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> writes:

> I have one. When I asked about inconsistencies in the PEG grammar I was 
> given an answer that some semantic parser should do that job. However, no 

What "inconsistencies" exist in the PEG grammar?

uakci <ciuak.prog@gmail.com> writes:

> really uses and which could be phrased in simpler terms. Irregularities in
> gismu frames. Many, many internal distinctions like PU vs. VI vs. ZI vs.

To what irregularities in gismu frames do you refer?

{ta'o doi pycyn}, there is such a thing as a paragraph.  :P

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lojban/86h7xnb6zy.fsf_-_%40cmarib.ramside.