Received: from mail-ot1-f57.google.com ([209.85.210.57]:34293) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kiI42-000O7P-7q for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:16:04 -0800 Received: by mail-ot1-f57.google.com with SMTP id f7sf856427oti.1 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:16:02 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1606400161; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fG2D4+rwVX/WZyeaVtyNJ1Rmf4D2I2b4sMtNkuCjIpjCIVKww/uRS0ohvguwwZ8pmt Fg9ukhfRHlg3FQ0bzxw6dkdYWu16N+qEapOiY0xpUsMdG1c2fRDOOGLmdlyCjch7jmAk C2pXmfdNPP3aRfYJ37iyT4NbrpiAdTLAbtRaM/nMYtYa4hjSZn+POgaNHl8a//XviGmp 67VBRkHsmM2/QmNAV9S1R+NTUiC1INES/xIqpmaQuQHYIXglZl7debgNJaqZHTPkvKLQ f/w9Neqba2w+AumkY5FO7vj/yCpEJyk4sHirKPlmGwZqRbmzssTeagnSop7G3U35yszG 9xtw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-help:list-post :list-id:mailing-list:precedence:reply-to:to:subject:message-id:date :from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:sender:dkim-signature :dkim-signature; bh=XnFf2tMYwQaLEsvx76nhj1ttgHDLYH+vWZhGdUGjMpU=; b=zSdb3jZN9b0MPDyox+6GGgOGalZmmN6oSLqHf10BPnFm8tV2++1Ah4xyDzbz0Fx/Nc f/jiwDOiFHjHowGdyLcoj9gsGP0467On05uk7kyU3FN3ifBRqhtpmrSsyJpbdGflU0AS ZmKEGotxTDjjRNxVOwRTi20r5F5OTAfy1scWw9G3ymcOdcWcvMOeA0C3FH6vfUDIZWlM yIBulK8K/Rs5YQVpwLQIKD+nkgrQhEiF9h5YCWpxRO29w8y82Lko8mMWTzNQi8tpkYu+ +yLZcJArydlw+yOYuMCUrXGWtbVW1NWlO9VHcADb7pOUmClCCHElGkZBvrET1n3rEy71 3tpg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=GqQVgsEd; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::330 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mturniansky@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20161025; h=sender:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=XnFf2tMYwQaLEsvx76nhj1ttgHDLYH+vWZhGdUGjMpU=; b=MFV9MdWguAuupJZN9/pCavVsxaLvEZp2PYdZ+jK7ixIsyJbOBqVhhsZmeSM8DG0oJF Z86tlQs9lS9nu2fWSi70xRAvYJQNNH7hY6CVhLKHhOPmpdXfoCHVlcCIg9AwaJYTPknK IKmr2zS5NaBrbLTER3MeAUdj+sKVRruOcyFAAWVekGYIFO/nHG15rj2zbx3eaEX/D8TM GlID0Vffs7I7NxGV5b4MW5fwOUZ1txHRe7eguK0Y+EDum3tuXrHLdmI6J49bNZilMxIA /oSsGCvcRNAVxUj+yoxFUt64UIgAbuFoCFli7oyYwyi8pdI60q3b/YbTV+ypua8CR/Kf g5nQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=XnFf2tMYwQaLEsvx76nhj1ttgHDLYH+vWZhGdUGjMpU=; b=ZIWRJYajwOp9K1KDSQWC/urATsEdCDiXdtbT0a3BcFgekpgR4WUpq+ADAVtiaOtS+n XSS5oRJmm5uk4wYFjFEomlvrFpT4fJ/eRZImw97Hqj3ft84CuRIRY56Cx+272y1g6T2A SNsCRBhy+5cjdl7Bavwa3kqnRrERt7+gpwabe7GRlYmtgL/97zt9SPitiLn8svlqEL+n sWYaWcFNKCvvP9KfbI1e8lyHzD9TL7fKy1kqZ4+3jDK2cHximnHbFQDUs1cCZBjUfj3F 8vgXCDHiqWZV1J0ngkhDKGw4sIy1TA7QiQFSRRCSGa2RbawQc78aQI+vF7EL5TUv0JCh Yiog== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=sender:x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=XnFf2tMYwQaLEsvx76nhj1ttgHDLYH+vWZhGdUGjMpU=; b=owzbau3g5A5rQzo8RwXwI37cOc7hhn7k6f78wqt+hBmQHt/OnL6OPLU1GsAPiuWvBh b6w2rLgo/ikloxt3gBxaA5HSF0fMIF+p2N+KzfqgybHPvL1TEKbrC9b2bF2KsycaRF3O /fTIgWDmH81h5jvMRnCMbRdwHX4ttfnt5KgMCNMSrCHYRn/XO23fZtrxYlzwD/sKVfG3 4Owx3Ud0Svn3xGigNos0V8u3YxXgnV2xfjEIpx5YSYgVRw+guOsbMy3NVIYhwfI+AKSi 1CtX+FyWShgCKei9AsglziV/aEU4VIPA5g1enaDP0jeyXc6MMHFdKKiTCpe7De4gZWV9 bUGA== Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533mv8vlP24cbN+Mk5dT+lZLZd0odyuwPZMAAeQFuPMx7MNrPmBN 7t4eH4qvSpmqqCSu4++vJr8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzbr3LFb1GgYc2mAy4syg1cQq+cy8+tlLY7py2IwybhA+v32tbY3LbRqMEORCfmjULigBcg6g== X-Received: by 2002:aca:4849:: with SMTP id v70mr2154960oia.103.1606400161083; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:16:01 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:a9d:7756:: with SMTP id t22ls524556otl.8.gmail; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:16:00 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:24a6:: with SMTP id z35mr2600544ota.61.1606400160447; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:16:00 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1606400160; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=HRquOovJ5tICOHM0tpRbXVUt05FgLTVmt3az15TTT8tBGgKuSm2ClnDmycKMg10VPP ISYccM+nXzGaS8WsziFrU0vwYnflzSeoE1oTkZN6dbOhf/9YvY/pWZf/JERktk+TT6f2 81tWATOvPY25UuWB26Pb3oZcPF1MrHEZkypQc/dPiWTSRxCyGLZan1FaazT7BQaG6Mw6 bdPB1hDwzIOtua07tHsMh6nqGpf72zDDnu1TcT7LwkGpU8vG+9Po2J9fFRGtGPzCogUh HryRWmF3kFUEVNGHi/hLsTDhPqGcoJxn9y08ykZojkxuOab/Z+w8E5N2QRKNQ0gaUKOl v0EQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :dkim-signature; bh=9Zmgz1ZCewEirhHyisD1KvRWMTx/I67jLSJXNgHDTus=; b=wc0uppK/dHEWFMXnp4AQ9wKuHYV2W7tlcqc60SF2goYh3c7udAYIUgDVg9PaHZ3ase wYoC0xd/JBjiztoObW1Gdsy0LBrfi7HQ7oioTdgwKSNo1I3H1RxqQhKSjuI1cLdS628k KEEv3J9FaeZclxVw+2MoJecRn5Ill/d+XzvzYilsvK1zqJSjUZH9sIf77xTYGbthM50G 8mIDIaEGHGeApLa9vBnK/MO7AMs3PlHjU/3lhVmlBJEieRksz6+0DPQ/1CSsW5YN/OR6 BZColubFuESJGXqpGMSEJDglAcwE82hfDs0M76PkXrDlQPBxnwkXlD/FR4An6z/0pzcp 4rfg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=GqQVgsEd; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::330 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mturniansky@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: from mail-ot1-x330.google.com (mail-ot1-x330.google.com. [2607:f8b0:4864:20::330]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o26si544010otk.2.2020.11.26.06.16.00 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:16:00 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::330 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::330; Received: by mail-ot1-x330.google.com with SMTP id z24so1991952oto.6 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:16:00 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:589:: with SMTP id 9mr2459258otd.72.1606400159924; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:15:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2914956.R1SSoXq267@puma> In-Reply-To: <2914956.R1SSoXq267@puma> From: Michael Turniansky Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:15:24 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} To: lojban@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e645f305b5032eeb" X-Original-Sender: Mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=GqQVgsEd; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::330 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mturniansky@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_bar: -- --000000000000e645f305b5032eeb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable le bomju ki'a .i zo bomju cu xelfanva zoi gy "bum" gy xu la lojban la gliban zi'o? On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 6:16 AM Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Sunday, November 22, 2020 5:07:48 PM EST Ilmen wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > > > I would like to ask you clarifications on the meaning of the cmavo > > {zo'e}, which is defined in the CLL at > > https://lojban.github.io/cll/7/7/index.html > > as meaning =E2=80=9Cthe o= bvious > > value=E2=80=9D, =E2=80=9Cwhatever I want it to mean but haven=E2=80=99t= bothered to figure out, > > or figure out how to express=E2=80=9D. > > > > Let's consider the following three example sentences: > > > > =E2=80=A2 [A] {mi tirna zo'e} > > =E2=80=A2 [B] {mi tirna su'o da} > > =E2=80=A2 [C] {(da'o) mi tirna ko'a} (usage of a constant {ko'a} which = hasn't > > been assigned a value explicitly earlier) > > > > How does [A] semantically differ from [B] and [C]? (I suspect that the > > two latters ultimately mean the same thing.) > > How [A] should be represented in logical notation? > > {zo'e} cannot be a constant as it changes its referent(s) on each > > occurrence. > > {mi tirna zo'e .i mi viska zo'e} is compatible with {mi tirna lo datka .i > mi > viska lo gerku}, but {mi tirna su'o da .i mi viska su'o da} is not. > > > The gloss =E2=80=9Cthe obvious value=E2=80=9D given in the CLL may lead= one to consider > > =E2=80=9Cyou-know-what=E2=80=9D or =E2=80=9Csomething which you should = be able to identify > > easily=E2=80=9D as a possible meaning for {zo'e}, although the second w= ording > > =E2=80=9Cwhatever I want it to mean but haven=E2=80=99t bothered to fig= ure out, or > > figure out how to express=E2=80=9D doesn't seem to support it. > > That second wording doesn't imply that the addressee should be able to > > identify the referents of {zo'e}, but however it seems to imply that th= e > > speaker has a more precise idea on the referents than with a plain {su'= o > > da}, but didn't manage or bother to lay out a more detailed description= . > > Therefore, {su'o co'e} (=E2=80=9Csome thing(s) satisfying the contextua= lly > > salient predicate=E2=80=9D) or =E2=80=9Csome certain thing(s) (known by= the speaker but > > not necessarily by the listener)=E2=80=9D may also qualify as candidate > > definitions for {zo'e}. > > > > What in your opinion should be a more precise definition of {zo'e}? > > {zo'e} is equivalent to omission (which may require a FA to keep followin= g > arguments in the same place), except in a relative clause or abstraction, > where omission may be equivalent to {ke'a} or {ce'u}. Whether there is an > obvious value is dependent on context and pragmatics. > > =E2=80=94le trene cu catra le bomju poi xabju le mlana be le rendargu > =E2=80=94mi viska zo'e > Here {zo'e} could plausibly mean {le trene} or {le bomju} or {lo pixra be > le > fasnu}, but not {lo mlatu}. But if someone takes off my blindfold in a > field > where there are cats, and I say {mi viska zo'e}, {zo'e} likely means {lo > mlatu}. > > Pierre > -- > li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du > li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lojban/2914956.R1SSoXq267%40puma. > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/= lojban/CAKOEKkRpASKLMuhNdHnFwWUhBX%2Bnw2tBWO%3DPt9-Ny6zyaio_pw%40mail.gmail= .com. --000000000000e645f305b5032eeb Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
le bomju ki'a .i=C2=A0 zo bomju cu xelfanva zoi gy &qu= ot;bum" gy xu la lojban la gliban zi'o?

On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 6:1= 6 AM Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.or= g> wrote:
On Sunday, November 22, 2020 5:07:48 PM EST Ilmen wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I would like to ask you clarifications on the meaning of the cmavo
> {zo'e}, which is defined in the CLL at
> https://lojban.github.io/cll/7/7/index.html
> <https://lojban.github.io/cll/7/7/index.html&= gt; as meaning =E2=80=9Cthe obvious
> value=E2=80=9D, =E2=80=9Cwhatever I want it to mean but haven=E2=80=99= t bothered to figure out,
> or figure out how to express=E2=80=9D.
>
> Let's consider the following three example sentences:
>
> =E2=80=A2 [A] {mi tirna zo'e}
> =E2=80=A2 [B] {mi tirna su'o da}
> =E2=80=A2 [C] {(da'o) mi tirna ko'a} (usage of a constant {ko&= #39;a} which hasn't
> been assigned a value explicitly earlier)
>
> How does [A] semantically differ from [B] and [C]? (I suspect that the=
> two latters ultimately mean the same thing.)
> How [A] should be represented in logical notation?
> {zo'e} cannot be a constant as it changes its referent(s) on each<= br> > occurrence.

{mi tirna zo'e .i mi viska zo'e} is compatible with {mi tirna lo da= tka .i mi
viska lo gerku}, but {mi tirna su'o da .i mi viska su'o da} is not.=

> The gloss =E2=80=9Cthe obvious value=E2=80=9D given in the CLL may lea= d one to consider
> =E2=80=9Cyou-know-what=E2=80=9D or =E2=80=9Csomething which you should= be able to identify
> easily=E2=80=9D as a possible meaning for {zo'e}, although the sec= ond wording
> =E2=80=9Cwhatever I want it to mean but haven=E2=80=99t bothered to fi= gure out, or
> figure out how to express=E2=80=9D doesn't seem to support it.
> That second wording doesn't imply that the addressee should be abl= e to
> identify the referents of {zo'e}, but however it seems to imply th= at the
> speaker has a more precise idea on the referents than with a plain {su= 'o
> da}, but didn't manage or bother to lay out a more detailed descri= ption.
> Therefore, {su'o co'e} (=E2=80=9Csome thing(s) satisfying the = contextually
> salient predicate=E2=80=9D) or =E2=80=9Csome certain thing(s) (known b= y the speaker but
> not necessarily by the listener)=E2=80=9D may also qualify as candidat= e
> definitions for {zo'e}.
>
> What in your opinion should be a more precise definition of {zo'e}= ?

{zo'e} is equivalent to omission (which may require a FA to keep follow= ing
arguments in the same place), except in a relative clause or abstraction, <= br> where omission may be equivalent to {ke'a} or {ce'u}. Whether there= is an
obvious value is dependent on context and pragmatics.

=E2=80=94le trene cu catra le bomju poi xabju le mlana be le rendargu
=E2=80=94mi viska zo'e
Here {zo'e} could plausibly mean {le trene} or {le bomju} or {lo pixra = be le
fasnu}, but not {lo mlatu}. But if someone takes off my blindfold in a fiel= d
where there are cats, and I say {mi viska zo'e}, {zo'e} likely mean= s {lo
mlatu}.

Pierre
--
li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du
li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lojban/2914956.R1SSoXq267%40puma.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to
lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.goog= le.com/d/msgid/lojban/CAKOEKkRpASKLMuhNdHnFwWUhBX%2Bnw2tBWO%3DPt9-Ny6zyaio_= pw%40mail.gmail.com.
--000000000000e645f305b5032eeb--