Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of scope845hlang343jbo@icebubble.org designates 2607:f2f8:a1d8::b19:0:f0b as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f2f8:a1d8::b19:0:f0b;
From: scope845hlang343jbo@icebubble.org
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: [lojban] Re: {zo'e}
References: <bad4709c-1c05-d4f7-f56c-78089950fa4f@gmail.com>
	<2914956.R1SSoXq267@puma>
	<CAKOEKkRpASKLMuhNdHnFwWUhBX+nw2tBWO=Pt9-Ny6zyaio_pw@mail.gmail.com>
	<3057250.gkAYTAapcS@puma>
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 00:31:42 +0000
In-Reply-To: <3057250.gkAYTAapcS@puma> (Pierre Abbat's message of "Thu, 26 Nov
	2020 11:37:53 -0500")
Message-ID: <86v9djg26p.fsf@cmarib.ramside>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
X-Spam_score: -2.8
X-Spam_score_int: -27
X-Spam_bar: --

Ilmen <ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com> writes:

> I would like to ask you clarifications on the meaning of the cmavo
> {zo'e}, which is defined in the CLL at
> https://lojban.github.io/cll/7/7/index.html

Formal definitions of cmavo can be found on the BPFK pages of the Wiki
at lojban.org.  When I say "formal" definitions, I mean that their
meanings are defined very specifially, typically using Lojban.

Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org> writes:

> {mi tirna zo'e .i mi viska zo'e} is compatible with {mi tirna lo datka .i mi 
> viska lo gerku}, but {mi tirna su'o da .i mi viska su'o da} is not.

I don't think that's correct.  IIRC, the two {da} are only synonymous
when the bridi are logically connected.  So, for example, if it were
{mi tirna su'o da .ije mi viska su'o da}, you'd be correct.

Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org> writes:

> Many years ago, I was traveling somewhere by train, and the train hit a 
> (drunk?) bum who had fallen asleep on the track. The crew told us that the 

That actually happened to an acquaintance of an acquaintance of mine, a
few years back.  Here's one of the newspaper articles on it:

  Dover Police: Man killed by train may have been a transient
  Foster's Daily Democrat
  Saturday, October 15, 2011
  By LARRY W. BROWN
  http://fosters.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20111015/GJNEWS_01/710159944/-1/FOSNEWS01/

Whether it was a murder or suicide was never quite sorted-out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lojban/86v9djg26p.fsf%40cmarib.ramside.