Return-path: Envelope-to: lojban-list-archive@lojban.org Delivery-date: Fri, 08 Jan 2021 11:46:57 -0800 Received: from mail-qv1-f57.google.com ([209.85.219.57]:43034) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kxxip-0018cC-Ql for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 11:46:57 -0800 Received: by mail-qv1-f57.google.com with SMTP id l3sf8985996qvr.10 for ; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 11:46:55 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1610135214; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=PAqx+VrR8gm0rOfxN9tnUdya14GhWIz7akSFFNamGHCH2DWJ+RnNhfl44XdwD8E2hY Uwa7isWA8ZlYEPm6HUvFsCO3e4uwjSQMr0Ql6MjHirVwZtE2n1CNVQOmU65FDPTXaXwf Y0zl00PnMPVw6kVWc+Ur0xWojzLgZRVivoLLuIwmACsAZMh3YVd7bfKn7xoPVLMB0L7j 29oTbHtfkYONuru2FCHpAIcW25Aqlx17thcckNXnMDZf5QCrHGWDd5TZyj7LmXopoBHC Pjxdqtk+UK9FFyKRUwCcpkW330VG8LyBDHtMVXm1/HiL28ReJTht7OYHqMOw1j/2uUdV 084A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-help:list-post :list-id:mailing-list:precedence:reply-to:to:subject:message-id:date :from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:sender:dkim-signature :dkim-signature; bh=7OLNwYQelRzqC6Rlna5Ai6v94V2lqaZc0bR1acS5Ak4=; b=I2M0e5gjyuMXql+uLQhIvD6sPqytbX/lAEKr9zyEuaE5L1K2KLdegtd4JPT462yDW8 PB01F6E0+ZE1IkS1zXJ/hZsugX3pgIQUwZxndTMVbd+A9U7qkr6iMYrXIgC4WKkKHuJy 7D9Lm4b10LG7lzTYijvamtxX/l+VtdL7Iwes0WYez9FPZh6OS9lAaxHvKRJaVqNvmwpB BfS9cNwQ6PrqjvmTiIB9Rfk+4ttkdRqHoSyo15OIrAaXXSUA/KXyH1zzakZLquLdSLq9 w1ToiqLpBY/JmW+TaHnMuNFroBC8BtUKJNF6EHhf/MaPDR/CBiMVRTcqWp5SRppubhNo oiNg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="gX/C0/0e"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of adamlopresto@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::b34 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=adamlopresto@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20161025; h=sender:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=7OLNwYQelRzqC6Rlna5Ai6v94V2lqaZc0bR1acS5Ak4=; b=Lmrecq0uOJtCydC8Dgob5ssD8X/jksoQ5iGJSPrhU6b8jkbRRqk3e6or6TQhBEyZ5L gbSqeDBPCzPWR9jMOQrBYtoTO7KjuJ7URHOW4w2VR4/mjMuWbXAB2fEO568bXQ7GO/Jq Pg/U0orj6AyWH1OHSMqpq1Ph324TX6NE20QsoI2lNZzzQItONSTzGlnYd+RqHi9rBQsG XV7mxlIhTufjS1NxMzgrok+sWtlnNtNiMpvTHnkHE2o17q26uc36TQTmHCb53AMhQDeC JX2BGBxJYrpIMfeWIoL6w1b7XKD5hIZFoyx7zOpHXy93DeAGamK/ML8BynXATAXMC0C8 1ivQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=7OLNwYQelRzqC6Rlna5Ai6v94V2lqaZc0bR1acS5Ak4=; b=C49nqd9Q5bj294x7+APcTX18uNoNFD4fpegz8GmO5kG/dIltr4qgSteIIhGD7aWHz1 LN4LwUuEj1ovaEIIKHidSQPUArdyFAXG4u5BgdIp02opNDltHnynmXeTVeUoYA1vFZ1n l8dgA6MKRh66pRZnmahf7YhyYw/5KM9+sRqE/Nok8+OwIwEncWyZht69g2kI4DE3yZg4 s1so6vq1qCLSR4/Gc/PLC6rs8sV8dDSo2UjWwMWX12dw854ylz8SLg5QsNQ5yxDr0Znz VD2EOncI6pqwqHzGvFXUj/QL3uQR7nAAS7YQXON2EUvtKp/ZZmDZOM/mJm4MrjyH7ZXJ Qa6w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=sender:x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=7OLNwYQelRzqC6Rlna5Ai6v94V2lqaZc0bR1acS5Ak4=; b=EgmbpDBp53U86vGFvrZpeYKuClOyJsbzhTf9CD+3/u9dTNw9ZwgZ4VnaOyG2GlS2rl pMHtXmbsG99zMK/9TkI0PFX0BTamnVzWBwU+w7n/F4Grtsbw1YfaoAsymhSdYfPXMzNN Y4RHEufqdSg4vutVDj+TgjWman6KI0yIm7bgGlK2R/aCOE96kNxGejtCf+pblwsYsOAc GwnfZaygTrLxjYHqjuz3r7qq1MQO5NJZAnjzBoDr1b7UmWAuBc/L6+n1DulyJd9LD/XQ nDOPqsQ35c6j07PvkmPImaaeIL2Wkkk6Rs5krT9C2qfq3t6N/QINRs07nvJ6UflqfBAq v4Lw== Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ehJ4CiW7LHpnxFnRjrgenixOiXh4g/FOCv+jF59oQw6bhGOFd ZkTcG1WhDVyRIdkg4wd0vGg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwdMrJUT3ZMjSjcOCF0mesDHVU80WmkOwEK5/B9Al2Rhc22GRao1TAdpxXvYTj4bLLfrr3Yfw== X-Received: by 2002:ae9:f70a:: with SMTP id s10mr5344319qkg.416.1610135214523; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 11:46:54 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:ad4:498e:: with SMTP id t14ls2860272qvx.0.gmail; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 11:46:54 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:d05:: with SMTP id 5mr5149607qvh.54.1610135213907; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 11:46:53 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1610135213; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FD7+dXiIyj6C3vVpd1m0LrFJmPZYUMZ3WsbnqPhHPx4I8s6Eix9Cac06c3uwXqHElS IBUwjiA17/saPYBE+UJwzxRJ84SqGttWkJdA1x6Tuy9b7I2qAuwDezPTNYqx4Rrw2x/l HvrCNbJwraxkkcVvirhQ730ByCQElzQ/bDnBgSvRg8SN9k+goBEOy9XU1k0CcI/XKz0t zbaJT1MEfZk1uThaxA+v89X0COcR4zx+8I1Sk1bKFfGP3i1S2KqIDLPU95XjeifocrHS m5mFAhonBZvIDboNrkFSVJUu+AMYYqa1WRFXCASWP2+vIDfKPQMYISe8Qx9c7Euuzw7S TDYA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :dkim-signature; bh=NeYlpeSxi29aNROGW0dZxLKxfjvGy9smyCdYtUL9qEM=; b=DsSyBdFv58oXb5lNjEgdkcS4iuycXUthw+0MUUbAmdmKcd/Duttwd6iamMilNB+zuA 6mZaY06K0BYf174cZfL1o/1YsjO94xqeUhVI0hwYYS/56EB22zjYpqc/FevNUKTru5Tj MeQZo1GeMP+xmMetWD+v/SbvEiB8lCVoxXdLPwRosQscW+8l/zTMjMmJCLScsKU0NHWv wPHw4OsrLivae0zKU3AkrvezGgrGjfMB4AoDjKZiNkF2ubPfxfFpXNUoG9gy2n1sHl+o UssAyKInbSvwqe7hxctqbzrkuOthZWxjVnwglPblJ8rYrYIwuIAs+WLbIhKOtrdhOSjB n0OA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="gX/C0/0e"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of adamlopresto@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::b34 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=adamlopresto@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: from mail-yb1-xb34.google.com (mail-yb1-xb34.google.com. [2607:f8b0:4864:20::b34]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p55si1064728qtc.2.2021.01.08.11.46.53 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Jan 2021 11:46:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of adamlopresto@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::b34 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::b34; Received: by mail-yb1-xb34.google.com with SMTP id r63so10424615ybf.5 for ; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 11:46:53 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a25:cb42:: with SMTP id b63mr8070676ybg.521.1610135213471; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 11:46:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2914956.R1SSoXq267@puma> <3057250.gkAYTAapcS@puma> <86v9djg26p.fsf@cmarib.ramside> <517f4985-4f82-495b-9b07-e03210186403n@googlegroups.com> <86wnwwcl2t.fsf@cmarib.ramside> <86sg7ehrgv.fsf@cmarib.ramside> In-Reply-To: From: Adam Lopresto Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 13:46:42 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: {zo'e} To: Lojban Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000707b5a05b868d175" X-Original-Sender: adamlopresto@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="gX/C0/0e"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of adamlopresto@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::b34 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=adamlopresto@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_bar: -- --000000000000707b5a05b868d175 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I don't think it's anywhere near that complicated. {lo na nanmu} just summons those things that satisfy {na nanmu}. If I spelled it {narnanmu} would that make it more obvious that it's not doing anything hugely elaborate? On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 12:32 PM Corbin Simpson wrote: > Note that {lo na} implicitly summons and invokes the Law of Excluded > Middle, as do many of these {no}/{na} rules. {lo na nanmu} first imagines > that there exists a collection of everything (questionable; is it a set?), > as well as a collection of all nanmu1 (must exist, by definition of > relations; in fact, it's a set!), and then takes the difference between > those collections (which might not be a set), and finally performs a > choice, requiring the full Axiom of Choice (because the collection is so > big!), to select something. The selection might be impredicative; how can > you show that the "everything" which is being ranged over is *actually* > being considered for selection? > On Friday, January 8, 2021 at 8:23:12 AM UTC-8 Adam Lopresto wrote: > >> {lo na nanmu} is still a thing (that is, it's still compatible with {su'o >> da} and not with {no da}), so there's no problem with {zo'e} reflecting it. >> It's a thing that doesn't {nanmu}, but it still has to be something. {lo na >> nanmu} successfully killed the Witch-King of Angmar. >> >> On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 6:40 PM wrote: >> >>> Jacob Thomas Errington writes: >>> >>> > {mi viska noda} is the same as {mi na viska su'o da}, so if what >>> > you're saying is true, then we can't know except through context >>> > whether a statement is affirmative or negative. Instead, use the >>> > observative {na viska}. >>> > >>> > A zo'e-like word (e.g. do'e, xo'e, etc.) shouln't be able to stand for >>> > something that makes the claim go from affirmative to negative or vice >>> > versa. >>> >>> If we use your interpretation, then {mi viska zo'e} could mean {mi viska >>> lo nanmu} but could not mean {mi viska lo na nanmu}. It seems, to me, >>> that {lo na nanmu} would be a perfectly legitimate meaning for {zo'e}. >>> >>> zo do'e ki'a >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "lojban" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com. >>> >> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lojban/86sg7ehrgv.fsf%40cmarib.ramside >>> . >>> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lojban/e61dc0af-1a6b-45b4-9930-acccd73a1a41n%40googlegroups.com > > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lojban/CABM8VqdtS%3Dz1xRVv%2BC2Uy5Sk-Cn%2B3KqcPq%3DwoGNVfYSw0N7L2g%40mail.gmail.com. --000000000000707b5a05b868d175 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I don't think it's anywhere near that complicated.= {lo na nanmu} just summons those things that satisfy {na nanmu}. If I spel= led it {narnanmu} would that make it more obvious that it's not doing a= nything hugely elaborate?=C2=A0

On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 12:32 PM Corbin Simps= on <mostawesomedude@gmail.c= om> wrote:
On Friday, January 8, 2021 at 8:23:12 AM UTC-8 Adam Lop= resto wrote:
{lo na nanmu} is still a thing (that is, it's still compa= tible=C2=A0with {su'o da} and not with {no da}), so there's no prob= lem with {zo'e} reflecting it. It's a thing that doesn't {nanmu= }, but it still has to be something. {lo na nanmu} successfully killed the = Witch-King of Angmar.=C2=A0

On Wed, Jan 6, = 2021 at 6:40 PM <scope845h...@icebubble.org> = wrote:
Jacob Thomas Errington <ja..= .@mail.jerrington.me> writes:

> {mi viska noda} is the same as {mi na viska su'o da}, so if what > you're saying is true, then we can't know except through conte= xt
> whether a statement is affirmative or negative. Instead, use the
> observative {na viska}.
>
> A zo'e-like word (e.g. do'e, xo'e, etc.) shouln't be a= ble to stand for
> something that makes the claim go from affirmative to negative or vice=
> versa.

If we use your interpretation, then {mi viska zo'e} could mean {mi visk= a
lo nanmu} but could not mean {mi viska lo na nanmu}.=C2=A0 It seems, to me,=
that {lo na nanmu} would be a perfectly legitimate meaning for {zo'e}.<= br>
zo do'e ki'a

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://group= s.google.com/d/msgid/lojban/e61dc0af-1a6b-45b4-9930-acccd73a1a41n%40googleg= roups.com.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.= google.com/d/msgid/lojban/CABM8VqdtS%3Dz1xRVv%2BC2Uy5Sk-Cn%2B3KqcPq%3DwoGNV= fYSw0N7L2g%40mail.gmail.com.
--000000000000707b5a05b868d175--