Envelope-to: lojban-list-archive@lojban.org
Delivery-date: Sat, 12 Jun 2021 06:03:42 -0700
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2021 06:03:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: "gleki.is...@gmail.com" <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
To: lojban <lojban@googlegroups.com>
Message-Id: <2b2e15fe-2d2b-4464-b952-aaba36a28a0an@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <2069336b-a422-4034-b088-174a44f57721n@googlegroups.com>
References: <3cb1fc04-c3d0-3535-099e-30b8b120f219@gmx.de>
 <2069336b-a422-4034-b088-174a44f57721n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [lojban] Re: A Simpler Quantifier Logic (blog article)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
	boundary="----=_Part_328_1075706832.1623503017628"
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
X-Spam_score: -2.6
X-Spam_score_int: -25
X-Spam_bar: --

------=_Part_328_1075706832.1623503017628
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_329_1771101078.1623503017628"

------=_Part_329_1771101078.1623503017628
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

tilju1 is non-distrubutive? why? because of this ambiguous notion of "mass"=
=20
or what?

Em sexta-feira, 11 de junho de 2021 =C3=A0s 03:14:18 UTC+3, Vincent Broman=
=20
escreveu:

> After re-reading la selpahi's excellent article on plural quantification,=
=20
> I became curious how much of a problem there was with collective or=20
> non-distributive sumti places.
> Does that just come up with jmaji, simxu, and a few others, or is it=20
> pervasive?
> So I went thru the whole gimste and decided which places seemed=20
> non-distributive and found 143, listed in the attachment.
> As I think PC pointed out, there were a good number of cases where usage=
=20
> might go either way depending on context.
> All the "under conditions" places might qualify, except I don't understan=
d=20
> the meaning of that, yet.
>
> Any one take a similar look at what places distribute?
>
> mihe la bremenli
>
> On Friday, October 7, 2016 at 5:09:59 AM UTC-7 selpa'i wrote:
>
>> In this article I will take a closer look at the quantifier logic=20
>> currently present in (post-xorlo) Lojban. I will identify logical=20
>> problems as well as practical disadvantages. Finally, I will offer a=20
>> solution that addresses both.=20
>>
>> Not only is the current system both impractical and unintuitive, its=20
>> introduction also left behind one major logical flaw as Lojban made the=
=20
>> move from singular logic to plural logic.=20
>>
>> Read on to find out what singular logic and plural logic are, how they=
=20
>> are related to xorlo, and why the current situation is not tenable.=20
>>
>> https://solpahi.wordpress.com/2016/09/25/a-simpler-quantifier-logic/=20
>>
>> ---=20
>> Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren gepr=C3=BCft.=
=20
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus=20
>>
>>

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/=
lojban/2b2e15fe-2d2b-4464-b952-aaba36a28a0an%40googlegroups.com.

------=_Part_329_1771101078.1623503017628
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

tilju1 is non-distrubutive? why? because of this ambiguous notion of "mass"=
 or what?<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"auto" class=3D"gmai=
l_attr">Em sexta-feira, 11 de junho de 2021 =C3=A0s 03:14:18 UTC+3, Vincent=
 Broman escreveu:<br/></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"marg=
in: 0 0 0 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1=
ex;"><div>After re-reading la selpahi&#39;s excellent article on plural qua=
ntification, I became curious how much of a problem there was with collecti=
ve or non-distributive sumti places.</div><div>Does that just come up with =
jmaji, simxu, and a few others, or is it pervasive?</div><div>So I went thr=
u the whole gimste and decided which places seemed non-distributive and fou=
nd 143, listed in the attachment.</div><div>As I think PC pointed out, ther=
e were a good number of cases where usage might go either way depending on =
context.</div><div>All the &quot;under conditions&quot; places might qualif=
y, except I don&#39;t understand the meaning of that, yet.</div><div><br></=
div><div>Any one take a similar look at what places distribute?</div><div><=
br></div><div>mihe la bremenli<br></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div=
 dir=3D"auto" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Friday, October 7, 2016 at 5:09:59 AM=
 UTC-7 selpa&#39;i wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin:0 0 0 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:=
1ex">In this article I will take a closer look at the quantifier logic=20
<br>currently present in (post-xorlo) Lojban. I will identify logical=20
<br>problems as well as practical disadvantages. Finally, I will offer a=20
<br>solution that addresses both.
<br>
<br>Not only is the current system both impractical and unintuitive, its=20
<br>introduction also left behind one major logical flaw as Lojban made the=
=20
<br>move from singular logic to plural logic.
<br>
<br>Read on to find out what singular logic and plural logic are, how they=
=20
<br>are related to xorlo, and why the current situation is not tenable.
<br>
<br><a href=3D"https://solpahi.wordpress.com/2016/09/25/a-simpler-quantifie=
r-logic/" rel=3D"nofollow" target=3D"_blank" data-saferedirecturl=3D"https:=
//www.google.com/url?hl=3Dpt&amp;q=3Dhttps://solpahi.wordpress.com/2016/09/=
25/a-simpler-quantifier-logic/&amp;source=3Dgmail&amp;ust=3D162358937209700=
0&amp;usg=3DAFQjCNEh_5vzQirq7ryqid_UmbScGPI02w">https://solpahi.wordpress.c=
om/2016/09/25/a-simpler-quantifier-logic/</a>
<br>
<br>---
<br>Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren gepr=C3=BCft.
<br><a href=3D"https://www.avast.com/antivirus" rel=3D"nofollow" target=3D"=
_blank" data-saferedirecturl=3D"https://www.google.com/url?hl=3Dpt&amp;q=3D=
https://www.avast.com/antivirus&amp;source=3Dgmail&amp;ust=3D16235893720970=
00&amp;usg=3DAFQjCNGnCUWn1IcBUNSfcIVv4vYek5n6ww">https://www.avast.com/anti=
virus</a>
<br>
<br></blockquote></div></blockquote></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;lojban&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to <a href=3D"mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">lojban+unsub=
scribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
To view this discussion on the web visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.c=
om/d/msgid/lojban/2b2e15fe-2d2b-4464-b952-aaba36a28a0an%40googlegroups.com?=
utm_medium=3Demail&utm_source=3Dfooter">https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/l=
ojban/2b2e15fe-2d2b-4464-b952-aaba36a28a0an%40googlegroups.com</a>.<br />

------=_Part_329_1771101078.1623503017628--

------=_Part_328_1075706832.1623503017628--