Return-path: Envelope-to: lojban-list-archive@lojban.org Delivery-date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 05:22:24 -0800 Received: from mail-qk1-f183.google.com ([209.85.222.183]:56005) by d7893716a6e6 with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1pBFL4-00Cur7-B8 for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 05:22:24 -0800 Received: by mail-qk1-f183.google.com with SMTP id bk24-20020a05620a1a1800b006ffcdd05756sf14824717qkb.22 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 05:22:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20210112; h=list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-help:list-post :list-id:mailing-list:precedence:reply-to:x-original-sender :mime-version:subject:references:in-reply-to:message-id:to:from:date :sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=B0oaaJPA2K6x7k9fU+BTFG+bspxzdQAq9BlRf+xaL7M=; b=ZsKv197MNBIJzt0QTOPxfojZd82fZ/cvBegARBqN/L+qKcOVLhjeQ7nOXEepCdINf4 mXEjS16wr+y9NI1+PiNisMR4W0avH2+ieQsscujoZhbiCzm8nENmajkQ6miamvd+2hud DyENqAmbCRnNFeuxYMpyguT6HGX7ChDJUyFwCSErathUeHmEFI3uycUaQ4VVoJD5RDxg Q4dWx1U5j1MGkX0V1xVk1yloCF2m66G7AbjeLVdiJfYNoTGmuMxJuN9A4NttQXXrNhWY 2lwfB+jt7zwe3+ufvZT7w30dVlPaSF7Zb7joZL422BhqW2+zlL52fvS4+Weeb2rM9fqk S7Lw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-help:list-post :list-id:mailing-list:precedence:reply-to:x-original-sender :mime-version:subject:references:in-reply-to:message-id:to:from:date :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=B0oaaJPA2K6x7k9fU+BTFG+bspxzdQAq9BlRf+xaL7M=; b=eDOTFJIpZ8LWtcZ0ckGxKFhmWxPzlhA+EY8PUIa5hPCQ3dIz/7NZlSK+xD+Ez8S0XG LPQqBWf+0HYx1mUXUcKn9eVGZZPdmjub4PkldZ0yfrFMRbdUFwva4T6xBmIq2PP9Stg7 7GWHYgBiLubgL/y3ep+lQocl+t9xjpFmk3TI3K3g+E8Azva3wR4kaGj2Yt06xzceBWLd xAlnmaTEUsSmlVMDsu4zDAmZ4IELsdcSh7Bn34WTyqg4tXgDy6yRg+5E7GHci9IGx4Jb 2X2R7mJHSnfpVzYnA0E2A7x2aaAIAwc+lZJ2/Hm4HodUc9E0xMlOlck3FuCMlifX6ih+ F5pw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-help:list-post :x-spam-checked-in-group:list-id:mailing-list:precedence:reply-to :x-original-sender:mime-version:subject:references:in-reply-to :message-id:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=B0oaaJPA2K6x7k9fU+BTFG+bspxzdQAq9BlRf+xaL7M=; b=OtMsGJvps53wSb5Xr/julU0FkYRK9WK3nykDJ4ImJJ9Ucy5omH9v8glbONtLhKDC+k tMiot45N8tgWAslYl5vuIfPy8XH+6KtzZAhvhc1PYeUfAC4y8ojtiuddh0tThX7zLDUE ST3LKfeZToi4FOL6BpQOoL/kAMTP6+CyWRlAp8IMmkpeIBa+kvHm94SmqB1fh6UXK7uu 8EkqAuEMCyAmZ3bKPU+/hd6NMvCJAxbM4PkovouWkcHXP5Sg7C9ZGloLrAQVMZ2DxUGj Nsw9QCr1kHQg/Sc2qjxIUc63LstjgyN3rfg5di4wioCEF2WdrlBDZQeZGKtjtZ7Tj0LF GDjw== Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kpJktID2vxMl3Mz4vvtTdNgsRdzadoB9/ZrpDGHIPatA4CLABmo FZaDwQbUYV0SCA9Jo62VyBs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXtqRMVU4AeSqM0+jkDRUtW/IenjDYYsvbcoiV1BIzM8YnlYI8svI907sh0IMJ7mwC9GvDXyug== X-Received: by 2002:a37:3d4:0:b0:6ff:b44d:4864 with SMTP id 203-20020a3703d4000000b006ffb44d4864mr1589370qkd.102.1672406540865; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 05:22:20 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:a0c:b255:0:b0:531:8666:af84 with SMTP id k21-20020a0cb255000000b005318666af84ls5996624qve.7.-pod-prod-gmail; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 05:22:19 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:458a:b0:4c7:56ed:43c1 with SMTP id op10-20020a056214458a00b004c756ed43c1mr1217954qvb.14.1672406539366; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 05:22:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 05:22:18 -0800 (PST) From: "gleki.is...@gmail.com" To: lojban Message-Id: <78755406-750b-4236-8a59-7c78256fb74bn@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <8bd63523-d407-4129-b448-c75a10afab0fn@googlegroups.com> References: <6ffc8d94-9c92-41d6-82f3-a229f4d9166cn@googlegroups.com> <4dbb3291-5008-9102-d7ac-f4e1484a1467@shoulson.com> <86mt764tq5.fsf@cmarib.ramside> <8bd63523-d407-4129-b448-c75a10afab0fn@googlegroups.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: "The beautiful little dancer" in Lojban MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_26282_362741327.1672406538601" X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -7.6 (-------) X-Spam_score: -7.6 X-Spam_score_int: -75 X-Spam_bar: ------- ------=_Part_26282_362741327.1672406538601 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_26283_1782135280.1672406538601" ------=_Part_26283_1782135280.1672406538601 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le jeudi 29 d=C3=A9cembre 2022 =C3=A0 11 h 17 min 45 s UTC+3, yanni...@gmai= l.com a=20 =C3=A9crit : > Thank you for your many answers. So it seems I can write: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *the gendered versionle melbi ke cmalu ke nakni dansuthe beautiful (= =20 > small ( male dancer)le melbi ke cmalu ke fetsi dansuthe beautif= ul=20 > ( small ( female dancer)the gendered affix versionle melbi ke cma= lu=20 > nakydansuthe beautiful ( small male-dancer)le melbi ke cmalu=20 > fe'idansuthe beautiful ( small female-dancer)* fe'irdansu (fe'idansu are two words) > But is there a semantic or pragmatic difference between "ke nakni dansu"= =20 > and "nakydansu"? > lujvo can have meaning separate from their underlying tanru. E.g.=20 {bramlatu} may mean "Big Cat" (lion, tiger etc.) as opposed to "big cat"=20 which might be just {barda mlatu} or {lo mlatu poi barda} =20 > > What I mean is: under what circumstances would you choose the affixed=20 > rather than the non-affixed version?=20 > > Is is that using "ke nakni" would mean emphasizing on the gender? > =20 > I noticed that some of you use the particle je and others ke, what is the= =20 > difference? > *ke ... [ke'e]* is a pair of brackets showing scope within tanru. Tanru by= =20 definition are vague entities so the logical AND operator *je* would be=20 more precise. =20 > > Thanks again, > > Yannis > > > On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 7:46:47 AM UTC+1=20 > scope845h...@icebubble.org wrote: > >> "Mark E. Shoulson" writes:=20 >> >> > You can also work ninmu/nanmu or fetsi/nakni into the the description= =20 >> > itself and not use a relative clause as gleki has done below.=20 >> >> I agree with Mark. I'd probably go with something like:=20 >> {le pa cmalu je melbi je ninmu dansu} and=20 >> {le pa cmalu je melbi je nanmu dansu}.=20 >> >> But in real-life Lojban, "the beautiful little dancer" would most likely= =20 >> occur with an antecedent, i.e.:=20 >> >> {pa lo ninmu cu sanli le tsina}=20 >> A woman stands on the stage.=20 >> {.i logo'i noi cmalu je melbi cu dansu}=20 >> [it/she], which/who is small and beautiful, dances.=20 >> >> In such usage, the gender is indicated upon first mention, with the=20 >> description referring to the gendered antecedent. It might be clearer=20 >> to examine the Lojban translation of "a beautiful little dancer."=20 >> > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/= lojban/78755406-750b-4236-8a59-7c78256fb74bn%40googlegroups.com. ------=_Part_26283_1782135280.1672406538601 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

L= e jeudi 29 d=C3=A9cembre 2022 =C3=A0 11 h 17 min 45 s UTC+3, yanni...@gmail= .com a =C3=A9crit :
Thank you for your many answers. So it seems I can write:
=
the gendered version

le melbi     &nbs= p;ke cmalu ke nakni dansu
the beautiful (  small (  male  = ;dancer)

le melbi      ke cmalu ke fetsi   dansu=
the beautiful (  small (  female  dancer)

the gen= dered affix version

le melbi      ke cmalu nakydansu<= br>the beautiful (  small male-dancer)

le melbi     &= nbsp;ke cmalu fe'idansu
the beautiful (  small female-dancer)

fe'irdansu (fe'idansu are two words)
=

Bu= t is there a semantic or pragmatic difference between "ke nakni dansu" and = "nakydansu"?

lujvo can have meaning separate from = their underlying tanru. E.g. {bramlatu} may mean "Big Cat" (lion, tiger etc= .) as opposed to "big cat" which might be just {barda mlatu} or {lo mlatu p= oi barda}
 
 
I noticed that some = of you use the particle je and others ke, what is the difference?

ke ... [ke'e] is a pair of brack= ets showing scope within tanru. Tanru by definition are vague entities so t= he logical AND operator je would be more precise.
&nb= sp; 
Thanks again,

Yannis


On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 7:46:47 AM UTC+1 scope845h...@icebubble.org wrote:=
"Mark E. Shoulson" &l= t;ma...@kli.org> writes:

> You can also work ninmu/nanmu or fetsi/nakni into the the descript= ion
> itself and not use a relative clause as gleki has done below.

I agree with Mark. I'd probably go with something like:
{le pa cmalu je melbi je ninmu dansu} and
{le pa cmalu je melbi je nanmu dansu}.

But in real-life Lojban, "the beautiful little dancer" would most likel= y
occur with an antecedent, i.e.:

{pa lo ninmu cu sanli le tsina}
A woman stands on the stage.
{.i logo'i noi cmalu je melbi cu dansu}
[it/she], which/who is small and beautiful, dances.

In such usage, the gender is indicated upon first mention, with the
description referring to the gendered antecedent. It might be clearer
to examine the Lojban translation of "a beautiful little dancer."

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/l= ojban/78755406-750b-4236-8a59-7c78256fb74bn%40googlegroups.com.
------=_Part_26283_1782135280.1672406538601-- ------=_Part_26282_362741327.1672406538601--