From sentto-44114-14781-1027712115-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Fri Jul 26 12:35:48 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 26 Jul 2002 12:35:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from n15.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.70]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 17YAsN-0004aD-00 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 12:35:47 -0700 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-14781-1027712115-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.192] by n15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Jul 2002 19:35:15 -0000 X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 26 Jul 2002 19:35:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 7799 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2002 19:35:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 26 Jul 2002 19:35:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.92) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Jul 2002 19:35:13 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 12:35:13 -0700 Received: from 200.49.74.2 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 19:35:13 GMT To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2002 19:35:13.0986 (UTC) FILETIME=[90196220:01C234DB] From: "Jorge Llambias" X-Originating-IP: [200.49.74.2] X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 19:35:13 +0000 Subject: Re: [lojban] rarna Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 311 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list la greg cusku di'e >don't take the above too seriously but just confirm whether I am correct in >saying: > >{ro cevna na prenu} <=> {naku su'o cevna cu prenu} No, that's incorrect. The correct transformations are: {ro cevni na prenu} <=> {su'o cevni naku prenu} {ro cevni naku prenu} <=> {naku su'o cevni cu prenu} Remember that {na} has scope over the whole bridi, including the preceding terms. See also: http://nuzban.wiw.org/wiki/index.php?DeMorgan%27s%20Laws mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Free $5 Love Reading Risk Free! http://us.click.yahoo.com/NsdPZD/PfREAA/Ey.GAA/GSaulB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/