From sentto-44114-14792-1027737021-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Fri Jul 26 19:32:32 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 26 Jul 2002 19:32:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from n15.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.70]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 17YHNe-0005HT-01 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 19:32:31 -0700 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-14792-1027737021-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.196] by n15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Jul 2002 02:31:59 -0000 X-Sender: BestATN@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 27 Jul 2002 02:30:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 45501 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2002 02:30:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 27 Jul 2002 02:30:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m01.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.4) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Jul 2002 02:30:21 -0000 Received: from BestATN@aol.com by imo-m01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v32.21.) id 5.ab.1f96a1fc (3866) for ; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 22:30:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10512 From: BestATN@aol.com X-Yahoo-Profile: lojbaner MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 22:30:18 EDT Subject: [lojban] Klingon orthography of Lojban Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_ab.1f96a1fc.2a735fba_boundary" X-archive-position: 322 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: BestATN@aol.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --part1_ab.1f96a1fc.2a735fba_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 2002-07-26 8:56:50 PM Eastern Daylight Time, lojban@yahoogroups.com writes: > Has anybody attempted a Klingon orthography for Lojban? ... -- > > Edward Cherlin > edward@webforhumans.com > I don't know if it's been done, but Klingon orthography ('native' pIqaD as well as the 'universally used' romanization) is not suited to any language except Klingon. Its sound system is at odds with Lojban, in particular, which is deliberately fairly symmetrical and comprehensive, while Klingon's is deliberately assymmetrical and full of gaps. Steven Lytle --part1_ab.1f96a1fc.2a735fba_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 2002-07-26 8:56:50 PM Eastern Daylight Time, lojban@yahoogroups.com writes:


Has anybody attempted a Klingon orthography for Lojban? ...
--

Edward Cherlin
edward@webforhumans.com

I don't know if it's been done, but Klingon orthography ('native' pIqaD as well as the 'universally used' romanization) is not suited to any language except Klingon.  Its sound system is at odds with Lojban, in particular, which is deliberately fairly symmetrical and comprehensive, while Klingon's is deliberately assymmetrical and full of gaps. 
Steven Lytle
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
Click here to visit our exclusive feature of ACUVUE2 Colours at LensExpress.com!
Click here to find your contact lenses!

To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
--part1_ab.1f96a1fc.2a735fba_boundary--