From sentto-44114-15087-1029360571-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Wed Aug 14 14:30:04 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:30:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from n24.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.80]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 17f5iM-0003YJ-01 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:30:02 -0700 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-15087-1029360571-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.193] by n24.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Aug 2002 21:29:31 -0000 X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 14 Aug 2002 21:29:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 35021 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2002 21:29:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 Aug 2002 21:29:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Aug 2002 21:29:30 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id D3FEC3C477; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 17:29:28 -0400 (EDT) To: X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <007201c24355$d6ede030$0200a8c0@avitallap> In-Reply-To: <007201c24355$d6ede030$0200a8c0@avitallap> X-Spamtrap: fesmri@ixazon.dynip.com Message-Id: <02081417292601.03066@neofelis> From: Pierre Abbat MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 17:29:26 -0400 Subject: Re: [lojban] kau -- What does it really mean?! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=CP 1255 X-archive-position: 617 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Tuesday 13 August 2002 19:04, Avital Oliver wrote: li'o > Now, the question is, using this interpretation of "kau", how would I > discuss possible answers to questions which aren't sumti? For example, how > would I say "The number of people is large", other than "le prenu cu > so'imei" -- A construct similar to "le xokau prenu cu barda", but that > would be nonsence, since the fact that there are N people can not be large. "le xokau prenu cu barda" means "the number of people who are large", except that it's a sentence. > One might suggest using sets, which I have some disagreements with (both > considering Jorge's ban on sets, and xod's thoughts, saying that a set is > not large -- it's cardinality is large). But this doesn't matter. What I'd > expect there to exist is something similar to a cmavo, that we shall call > "kaui", that can be used instead of "kau", but instead of creating a sumti > meaning "the fact that ...", we would just get the answer. Thus, I could > say: "le du'u xokaui prenu cu barda". Some people have suggested using "ni" > instead of my "ledu'u xokaui", but that's not what I understand of "ni". I > understand that "leni blanu" means blueness. The same people would say that > "blueness" is "leka blanu", which I disagree with, but this is not part of > this discussion. "leni blanu" and "leka blanu" both mean "blueness", but the former is a quantity and the latter a quality. phma ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> 4 DVDs Free +s&p Join Now http://us.click.yahoo.com/pt6YBB/NXiEAA/RN.GAA/GSaulB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/