From sentto-44114-15540-1031698762-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Tue Sep 10 15:59:57 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:59:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from n3.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.86]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 17otz7-0007g8-01 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:59:53 -0700 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-15540-1031698762-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.193] by n3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Sep 2002 22:59:22 -0000 X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_0_1); 10 Sep 2002 22:59:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 34191 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2002 22:59:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Sep 2002 22:59:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.250) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Sep 2002 22:59:20 -0000 Received: from Craig [209.42.200.29] by intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id A94936DA01C2; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 18:59:21 -0400 To: Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3D7E4D47.1090502@cs.technion.ac.il> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal X-Declude-Sender: raganok@intrex.net [209.42.200.29] X-eGroups-From: "Craig" From: "Craig" X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 18:59:20 -0400 Subject: RE: [lojban] How would you translate this? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 1071 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: ragnarok@pobox.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list >Well, in English it looks like deliberately wrong (the "say friend and >enter" would not be that much ambiguous). Probably in Elvish it is >cleaner. In other languages I know, the difference also exists, though >not as definite as in Lojban. But, can Lojban play this trick at all? In Sindarin, it actually has "friend" as mellon, rather than vellon, the form it would take if it were to be the object of the verb - meaning that it is only a little bit cleaner than the English. Lojban, however, would use: ko cusku doi pendo = speak, friend ko cusku zo pendo = say "friend" This would have to be about an order of magnitude above "ractu cafmi'a" if anyone can come up with an answer. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Sell a Home with Ease! http://us.click.yahoo.com/SrPZMC/kTmEAA/MVfIAA/GSaulB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/