From sentto-44114-15786-1032281498-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Tue Sep 17 09:53:50 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 17 Sep 2002 09:53:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from n27.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.83]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 17rLbf-0004un-01 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 09:53:47 -0700 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-15786-1032281498-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.200] by n27.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Sep 2002 16:51:38 -0000 X-Sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_3); 17 Sep 2002 16:51:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 64499 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2002 16:51:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 17 Sep 2002 16:51:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail2.reutershealth.com) (65.246.141.151) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Sep 2002 16:51:36 -0000 Received: from skunk.reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[10.65.117.21]) by mail2.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA01597; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 13:02:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200209171702.NAA01597@mail2.reutershealth.com> Received: by skunk.reutershealth.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 17 Sep 2002 12:51:34 -0400 To: pycyn@aol.com Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com In-Reply-To: from "pycyn@aol.com" at Sep 17, 2002 12:30:05 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] From: John Cowan X-Yahoo-Profile: john_w_cowan MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 12:51:34 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: I like chocolate Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 1274 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list pycyn@aol.com scripsit: > Of course, this involves a looks-like correlation (not at all natural, for all > that) and the case might be harder with non-representational or differently > representational (e.g., cubism) conventions I think it's erroneous to talk of "non-representational painting", a painting being essentially a representation, though not perhaps of anything we can see. "Non-objective painting" might be more appropriate. If a painting weren't a representation, it would be what Mark Twain said Whistler's painting was: a canvas covered with smears of tomato juice (or something to that effect). "We must be very careful to avoid wifty thinking." --David Jenner -- What is the sound of Perl? Is it not the John Cowan sound of a [Ww]all that people have stopped jcowan@reutershealth.com banging their head against? --Larry http://www.ccil.org/~cowan ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Sell a Home for Top $ http://us.click.yahoo.com/RrPZMC/jTmEAA/MVfIAA/GSaulB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/