From sentto-44114-15797-1032299625-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Tue Sep 17 14:55:55 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 17 Sep 2002 14:55:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from n30.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.87]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 17rQK1-0006Ta-00 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 14:55:53 -0700 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-15797-1032299625-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.193] by n30.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Sep 2002 21:53:45 -0000 X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_3); 17 Sep 2002 21:53:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 42838 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2002 21:53:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 17 Sep 2002 21:53:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.250) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Sep 2002 21:53:43 -0000 Received: from Craig [209.42.200.29] by intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id A467225E0296; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 17:53:43 -0400 To: Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <200209172202.SAA06403@mail2.reutershealth.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal X-Declude-Sender: raganok@intrex.net [209.42.200.29] X-eGroups-From: "Craig" From: "Craig" X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 17:53:43 -0400 Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: carolingianosity Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-archive-position: 1285 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: ragnarok@pobox.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list >> Oh, sorry: Of course it was "Das Heilige Römische Reich Deutscher Nation". >Usually just called the Holy Roman Empire in English -- there is a quip, >whose I don't know, that it was neither holy, Roman, nor an empire, but the >last point at least seems to me to be false. My sixth grade history teacher proved it by requiring "empires" to last beyond the deaths of their founders. When all else fails, change the definition! ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Plan to Sell a Home? http://us.click.yahoo.com/J2SnNA/y.lEAA/MVfIAA/GSaulB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/