From sentto-44114-15828-1032384652-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Wed Sep 18 14:33:08 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 18 Sep 2002 14:33:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from n17.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.72]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 17rmRV-0005vs-00 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 14:33:05 -0700 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-15828-1032384652-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.199] by n17.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Sep 2002 21:30:52 -0000 X-Sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_3); 18 Sep 2002 21:30:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 87221 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2002 21:30:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 18 Sep 2002 21:30:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailbox-3.st1.spray.net) (212.78.202.103) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Sep 2002 21:30:51 -0000 Received: from oemcomputer (host213-121-68-213.surfport24.v21.co.uk [213.121.68.213]) by mailbox-3.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 2881C18E06 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 23:30:49 +0200 (DST) To: Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <8c.1e32fa76.2ab7432f@aol.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 From: "And Rosta" X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 22:32:28 +0100 Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: I like chocolate Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 1316 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list pc: > jjllambias@hotmail.com writes: > << > I won't deny that until I see the complex hypothetical claim > expressed in Lojban. Unless it is so hypothetical that it can't > be expressed, in which case I have no problem with it. :) > >> > The difficulty in expressing it is Lojban is probably a major reason > why we have {lo'e} at all. But I am not about to get kicked around > again trying to work out Lojban hypotheticals and their kin. When > someone else gets that right, I will be happy to do these in Lojban. If you could post a set of English sentences that exemplify the hypotheticals that need to be rendered into Lojban, I'll see what I can do. My hope would be that {mu'ei} and {ba'oi} would do the job, but I'm not sure if they cover everything. --And. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> 4 DVDs Free +s&p Join Now http://us.click.yahoo.com/pt6YBB/NXiEAA/MVfIAA/GSaulB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/