From sentto-44114-15962-1032656384-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Sat Sep 21 18:02:25 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 21 Sep 2002 18:02:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from n25.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.81]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 17sv8d-0007yx-00 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 18:02:21 -0700 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-15962-1032656384-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.66.95] by n25.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Sep 2002 00:59:44 -0000 X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_3); 22 Sep 2002 00:59:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 46356 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2002 00:59:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Sep 2002 00:59:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d01.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.33) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Sep 2002 00:59:43 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-d01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.10.) id r.b6.121b3f8f (4468) for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 20:59:39 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10509 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 20:59:39 EDT Subject: [lojban] Re: bloti/marce Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_b6.121b3f8f.2abe6ffb_boundary" X-archive-position: 1451 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: pycyn@aol.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --part1_b6.121b3f8f.2abe6ffb_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/21/2002 2:14:24 PM Central Daylight Time, gordon.dyke@bluewin.ch writes: << > If I understand correctly then, bloti were intended to go on water, just > like karce have wheels? > > Could someone who was around when the place-structures were being debated > please confirm or deny the original intention? >> I'd bet on it, but given what all is missing, I'm not sure. If I had been told that {carce} at least covered sleds, I wouldn't have been surprise -- indeed, I still wouldn't be, given the odd definition (from my pov at the moment) of {skiji}. Still, I would go with the obvious from the English ('boat" is -- gravy aside -- clearer than "ship" or "vessel" would be; we'll skip Maine jokes about cars). --part1_b6.121b3f8f.2abe6ffb_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/21/2002 2:14:24 PM Central Daylight Time, gordon.dyke@bluewin.ch writes:

<<

If I understand correctly then, bloti were intended to go on water, just
like karce have wheels?

Could someone who was around when the place-structures were being debated
please confirm or deny the original intention?

>>
I'd bet on it, but given what all is missing, I'm not sure. If I had been told that {carce} at least covered sleds, I wouldn't have been surprise -- indeed, I still wouldn't be, given the odd definition (from my pov at the moment) of {skiji}. Still, I would go with the obvious from the English ('boat" is -- gravy aside -- clearer than "ship" or "vessel" would be; we'll skip Maine jokes about cars).

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
--part1_b6.121b3f8f.2abe6ffb_boundary--