From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Fri Sep 27 16:35:39 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:35:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailbox-6.st1.spray.net ([212.78.202.106]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17v4e1-0004nS-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:35:37 -0700 Received: from oemcomputer (host213-121-67-49.surfport24.v21.co.uk [213.121.67.49]) by mailbox-6.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9ABE29F19 for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 01:32:18 +0200 (DST) From: "And Rosta" To: Subject: [lojban] Re: paroi ro mentu Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 00:33:56 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20020927162235.GA28708@allusion.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-archive-position: 1646 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list jordan: > After the baseline ends, if there is sufficent desire for it a cmavo > could be created to invert tag scope, so you would say > ro mentu paroi > (for all minutes once). This requires a real grammar change and > such though, so I don't advocate using it until/unless it were to > be adopted into the official grammar after the baseline. > (It would need to add a > term -> sumti tag > rule). Couldn't you just use an experimental cmavo in UI? --And.