From fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com Sun Sep 29 12:51:55 2002
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 29 Sep 2002 12:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 17vk6Q-00058M-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 12:51:42 -0700
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g8TJtpGZ055732
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 14:55:51 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
	by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g8TJtp7C055731
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 14:55:51 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 14:55:51 -0500
From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: sticky hypothesis
Message-ID: <20020929195551.GB55560@allusion.net>
References: <170.149ce6d3.2ac8b128@aol.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TakKZr9L6Hm6aLOc"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <170.149ce6d3.2ac8b128@aol.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-archive-position: 1733
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list


--TakKZr9L6Hm6aLOc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 03:40:24PM -0400, pycyn@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 9/29/2002 5:10:01 AM Central Daylight Time, nessus@fre=
e.fr=20
> writes:
> <<
> > Is there a grammatical device to make some hypothesis
> > marked by {da'i} sticky? =20
> >>
> I suppose that this is pretty much like setting a time, setting a world i=
n=20
> which ...  So, {da'i ki} works until {na'u} or bare {ki}.  It does parse=
=20
> correctly by the way.

No it doesn't.  It doesn't attach the ki to the da'i.  I was trying
to find a way to do that using fi'o and such, but it doesn't work,
the KI gets read into a rule for simple-tense-modal which is nothing but
a KI.  So "ki" standing alone is in fact a term.

You *could* try to cheat with do'e like {do'e da'i ki} to at least put
them together though.

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
                                     sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--TakKZr9L6Hm6aLOc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE9l1rGDrrilS51AZ8RAkNEAJ4loznfxlTjRRC25+HsnTAMo/x6lwCgjfoV
Q6Kv76f7f+IwyY2tJYWyYpE=
=4MNa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--TakKZr9L6Hm6aLOc--