From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Fri Sep 06 13:40:49 2002
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 06 Sep 2002 13:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
	id 17nPuI-0006OC-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2002 13:40:46 -0700
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 13:40:46 -0700
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: Re: [lojban] General comment: 'here'.
Message-ID: <20020906204046.GD23094@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <20020905233937.GL14107@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20020906025706.GA4591@barsoom.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20020906025706.GA4591@barsoom.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-archive-position: 958
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 09:57:06PM -0500, the Edward Blevins wrote:
> I would argue that just because an english sentence uses "here" the
> lojban transaltion doesn't always need to treat it as a sumti.

Absolutely.  Unfortunately, I can't remember the original example.  8)

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ 	BTW, I'm male, honest.
le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno
je xlali -- RLP 				http://www.lojban.org/