From sentto-44114-16342-1033595160-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Wed Oct 02 14:49:49 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 02 Oct 2002 14:49:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from n40.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.108]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 17wrNK-0006VC-01 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2002 14:49:46 -0700 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-16342-1033595160-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.201] by n40.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Oct 2002 21:46:01 -0000 X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_4); 2 Oct 2002 21:45:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 9900 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2002 21:45:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Oct 2002 21:45:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.250) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Oct 2002 21:46:00 -0000 Received: from Craig [209.42.200.29] by intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id A918B0600030; Wed, 02 Oct 2002 17:46:00 -0400 To: Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-reply-to: <3D9B356D.5050509@bilkent.edu.tr> Importance: Normal X-Declude-Sender: raganok@intrex.net [209.42.200.29] X-eGroups-From: "Craig" From: "Craig" X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 17:45:59 -0400 Subject: [lojban] Re: The kind of publicity we have now Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 1831 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: ragnarok@pobox.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list >>>I like the sig though, which seems appropriate: >>>"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained >>> by stupidity." Hanlon's Razor (Who is/was this Hanlon?) >>> >> >>Almost certainly a modification of Robert Heinlein, the sf author, >>through oral tradition. >> >I heard it from an ex-head of the CIA, though I can't remember his name, >or whether it was original. The idea is old. The "Hanlon's Razor" name for that specific formulation of it is of course a parallel to Occam's Razor. Heinlein, who it has been suggested was Hanlon, used the idea in several of his books, though AFAIK he never used the standard phrasing. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Sell a Home for Top $ http://us.click.yahoo.com/RrPZMC/jTmEAA/MVfIAA/GSaulB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/