From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Mon Oct 28 12:13:16 2002
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:13:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
	id 186GG8-0002BE-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:13:12 -0800
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:13:12 -0800
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: <grumble> jmina vs. vimcu
Message-ID: <20021028201312.GG6599@digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <F193Q8n0lfEmBpWD5r400002f61@hotmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <F193Q8n0lfEmBpWD5r400002f61@hotmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
X-archive-position: 2344
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 12:42:47PM +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote:
> 
> la camgusmis cusku di'e
> 
> >Why is the x2 of jmina the thing added to, but the x3 of vimcu is the
> >thing subtracted from?
> 
> The first definition of jmina is "x1 adds x2 to x2", so x2 is the
> thing added, not added to.

Oh.

'k.

Thanks.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/  http://www.lojban.org/
la lojban. jai curmi roda .einai to ku'i so'ada mukti le nu co'a
darlu le'o -- RLP                            I'm a *male* Robin.