From fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com Mon Oct 28 13:51:30 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:51:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 186HnC-000395-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:51:26 -0800 Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g9SLur9B073092 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:56:53 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com) Received: (from fracture@localhost) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g9SLuqkQ073091 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:56:52 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:56:52 -0600 From: Jordan DeLong To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: cfari vs. fanmo Message-ID: <20021028215652.GA72973@allusion.net> References: <20021028201407.GH6599@digitalkingdom.org> <20021028214857.GA72708@allusion.net> <20021028214446.GM6599@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021028214446.GM6599@digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-archive-position: 2348 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 01:44:46PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 03:48:58PM -0600, Jordan DeLong wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 12:14:07PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > > Why does cfari not have the incredibly useful second place that fanmo > > > does? > >=20 > > cfari and fanmo aren't parallel in concept. cfari and mulno are. > >=20 > > I think krasi is the on which is parallel to fanmo. >=20 > Ah, that makes sense. My problem with krasi is it sounds like it's > non-temporal when I read the def'n, but that's probably my problem. The gi'uste says krasi can be used with events/objects/processes. "source/start/beginning" seems like it gets the oposite of fanmo. When used with objects it is probably more about space (le krasi be le linji, etc). --=20 Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u sei la mark. tuen. cusku --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9vbKkDrrilS51AZ8RAt5WAJ9u2EKVVZ5FFl/RBXx2Ye9dqGKSrQCgsjyt YxJut/EhMy6Jl/OWBr6pARM= =rUl0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO--