From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Wed Nov 06 05:42:13 2002
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 06 Nov 2002 05:42:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from com1.uclan.ac.uk ([193.61.255.3])
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 189QRe-0005L4-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2002 05:42:10 -0800
Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer);
          Wed, 6 Nov 2002 13:08:07 +0000
Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk
          with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 06 Nov 2002 13:41:15 +0000
Message-Id: <sdc91bfb.042@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 13:40:42 +0000
From: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
To: lojban-list <lojban-list@lojban.org>
Subject: [lojban] Re: zo'e = ? su'o de (was Re: What the heck is this crap?)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Content-Disposition: inline
X-archive-position: 2452
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

Jordan:
#> I'd say that they mean the same, and that if they both are equivalent
#> to a form involving {da po'u na'e bo le broda} then they both 
#> entail {da me/du na'e bo le broda}. 
#
#no na'ebo le broda cu klama ==
#naku su'o na'ebo le broda cu klama
#
#I don't see how that leads to
#da klama
#
#But, mi na'e certu tu'a loi logji, so lemme know if i'm missing
#something.

No, we agree on this too. They don't lead to da klama, but they do lead
to da me/du na'e bo le broda.

--And.