From jcowan@reutershealth.com Wed Nov 06 13:05:36 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 06 Nov 2002 13:05:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from [65.246.141.151] (helo=mail2.reutershealth.com) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 189XMj-0007tl-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2002 13:05:33 -0800 Received: from skunk.reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[10.65.117.21]) by mail2.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA08985; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 16:16:36 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200211062116.QAA08985@mail2.reutershealth.com> Received: by skunk.reutershealth.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 6 Nov 2002 16:02:41 -0500 From: John Cowan Subject: [lojban] Re: So, what about le and da? (was Re: Re: What the heck is this crap?) To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 16:02:41 -0500 (EST) Cc: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <20021106205839.GK22843@digitalkingdom.org> from "Robin Lee Powell" at Nov 06, 2002 12:58:39 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 2465 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Robin Lee Powell scripsit: > "mean essentially the same thing" isn't exactly a strong endorsement. I attempted to avoid strong endorsements, just in case they turned out to be strongly wrong. :-) > Well, that leads to my next question: is the outer quantifier of le > veridical (whereas the inner is not)? So I believe; I'm not sure if the book says so. -- Only do what only you can do. John Cowan --Edsger W. Dijkstra, http://www.reutershealth.com deceased 6 August 2002 http://www.ccil.org/~cowan