From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Wed Nov 06 17:57:44 2002
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 06 Nov 2002 17:57:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mrin02.spray.se ([212.78.193.8] helo=mrin02.st1.spray.net)
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 189bvQ-00007R-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2002 17:57:40 -0800
Received: from lmin04.st1.spray.net (lmin04.st1.spray.net [212.78.202.104])
	by mrin02.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37241243EE6
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Thu,  7 Nov 2002 02:57:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from oemcomputer (host213-121-66-176.surfport24.v21.co.uk [213.121.66.176])
	by lmin04.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB5A1C166
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Thu,  7 Nov 2002 02:57:05 +0100 (MET)
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
To: <lojban-list@lojban.org>
Subject: [lojban] Re: So, what about le and da?  (was Re: Re: What the heck is this crap?)
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 01:58:51 -0000
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMCEFHGNAA.a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <20021106202731.GH22843@digitalkingdom.org>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
X-archive-position: 2476
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

Robin:
> Is it derivable from that book that le broda can be converted to
> something involving da?  If so, what is the exact form of that
> conversion?

I don't know what is derivable from the book. But IMO {ro da
poi ke'a cmima le'i broda} and {ro da po'u su'o lu'a le'i
broda} are fully legitimate.

--And.