From sentto-44114-17020-1036698365-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Thu Nov 07 14:54:07 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 07 Nov 2002 14:54:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from n38.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.106]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 189vXH-0000X5-02 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2002 14:54:03 -0800 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-17020-1036698365-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.192] by n38.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Nov 2002 19:46:05 -0000 X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 7 Nov 2002 19:46:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 74334 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2002 19:46:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 Nov 2002 19:46:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.33) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Nov 2002 19:46:05 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 11:46:05 -0800 Received: from 200.49.74.2 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 07 Nov 2002 19:46:04 GMT To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Nov 2002 19:46:05.0183 (UTC) FILETIME=[4F3428F0:01C28696] From: "Jorge Llambias" X-Originating-IP: [200.49.74.2] X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 19:46:04 +0000 Subject: [lojban] Re: importing ro Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 2501 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list la camgusmis cusku di'e > > ro broda cu brode > > = ro da poi broda cu brode > > = ro da ga na broda gi brode > >It would help me if someone would describe the other alternative in the >format above. The other alternative (favoured by pc) is: ro broda cu brode = ge de broda gi ro da ga na broda gi brode You can see that both alternatives agree when some broda exists, but give opposite truth values when there are no broda. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/