From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Thu Nov 14 11:18:49 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:18:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18CPVm-0003dt-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:18:46 -0800 Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:18:46 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Wiki summary of consensus about {ro} Message-ID: <20021114191846.GI439@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 2606 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 01:30:34PM +0000, And Rosta wrote: > The big debate about "importing ro" moved from this list to Jboske, > where is was eventually resolved. The consensus is given on the wiki > (in a text that the debate's participants approved): > > http://www.lojban.org/wiki/index.php/quantification%20and%20the%20meaning%20of%20ro Thank you very much for getting this written up! In addition, I would like a comprehensive list of people who have agreed to this, please. Such a list should probably go on the page itself. I have placed some minor questions on the page. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ http://www.lojban.org/ la lojban. jai curmi roda .einai to ku'i so'ada mukti le nu co'a darlu le'o -- RLP I'm a *male* Robin.