From fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com Mon Nov 18 20:12:15 2002
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 18 Nov 2002 20:12:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 18Dzk7-0000th-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 20:12:07 -0800
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id gAJ4J3WF098254
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:19:03 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
	by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id gAJ4J23p098253
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:19:02 -0600 (CST)
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:19:02 -0600
From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Let's be friends
Message-ID: <20021119041902.GA98029@allusion.net>
References: <20021116225301.QCGE4359.tomts9-srv.bellnexxia.net@Savv> <20021116231947.GX17076@digitalkingdom.org> <3DD7720A.208@bilkent.edu.tr> <02111721181100.03071@neofelis> <3DD8C870.4020504@bilkent.edu.tr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3DD8C870.4020504@bilkent.edu.tr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-archive-position: 2629
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list


--sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 01:01:04PM +0200, robin wrote:
> Pierre Abbat wrote:
> >On Sunday 17 November 2002 05:40, Robin Turner wrote:
> >
> >>Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> >>
> >>>You've been virused.
> >>
> >>.u'i - and I thought it was a reference to the jboste controvery!
> >>
> >>mi snuge'i le nu mi na'e pilno la .uindoz.
> >
> >
> >.i do mo la .uindoz?
>=20
> OK, it was a slip - I should have used {na}.  Though the possibilities=20
> are intriguing ....

Why should you have used na?

For example,
do tesete djuno la .uindoz. zo'e
do sanji la .uindoz.
do tcidu loi mrilu noi se finti loi prenu noi pilno la .uindoz.

Both na'e and na are correct here, they just make slightly different
claims.

OTOH, I don't have any idea what "snuge'i" means (I think this is
what pierre was actually asking about).

  mu'o
--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
                                     sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE92bu2DrrilS51AZ8RAmzGAJ4672rvwbURgx2mUo3VotCsdM+msgCdFCjP
BMFavx8p+2IxgRQRKcCfl1s=
=Edgs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu--