From olivera@macs.biu.ac.il Mon Nov 25 08:40:17 2002
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 25 Nov 2002 08:40:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2.cc.huji.ac.il ([132.64.1.18])
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 18GMHN-0005hm-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 08:40:14 -0800
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by mail2.cc.huji.ac.il (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 2DA853FF3E; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 18:40:11 +0200 (IST)
Received: from cc.huji.ac.il (cc.huji.ac.il [132.64.1.5])
	by mail2.cc.huji.ac.il (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D843FE6A
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 18:40:11 +0200 (IST)
Received: from avitallap (di8-652.dialin.huji.ac.il [132.64.15.152])
	by cc.huji.ac.il (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FE9B4902
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 18:40:09 +0200 (IST)
Message-ID: <005201c294db$1531d050$0300a8c0@avitallap>
From: "Avital Oliver" <olivera@macs.biu.ac.il>
To: <lojban-list@lojban.org>
References: <sde250c0.089@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
Subject: [lojban] Re: Is .e == .ije?
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 18:33:37 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-archive-position: 2700
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: olivera@macs.biu.ac.il
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

Ok, everyone.
I sucked again.

{mo mi e do} is just as good as {mo fa mi e do}
Any answer to the former can be given a "se" at the beginning and be an
answer to the latter.

...


----- Original Message -----
From: "And Rosta" <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
To: "olivera" <olivera@macs.biu.ac.il>
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: [lojban] Is .e == .ije?


> >>> Avital Oliver <olivera@macs.biu.ac.il> 11/25/02 10:56pm >>>
> > #Actually, it would be {mo fi mi e do}. Other than that I like your
> solution.
> > What would be {mo fi mi e do}? What's wrong with {mo mi e do} and
> > {mo mi ije go'i do}?
> Sorry, I totally sux0red. I meant {mo fa mi e do}.
> ---------------------------------
>
> I still don't see anything wrong with {mo mi e do}, unless for some weird
> reason you want the answer to be nothing but a predicate in which mi e do
> fills the x1.
>
> --And.
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>