From fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com Mon Nov 25 16:57:10 2002
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 25 Nov 2002 16:57:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 18GU2B-0004AS-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 16:57:04 -0800
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id gAQ14WWF071449
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 19:04:32 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
	by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id gAQ14Wwh071448
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 19:04:32 -0600 (CST)
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 19:04:31 -0600
From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Is .e == .ije?
Message-ID: <20021126010431.GA71193@allusion.net>
References: <001901c294a7$68b5f640$0300a8c0@avitallap> <3DE20F4B.3060000@bilkent.edu.tr> <20021125160835.GA69822@allusion.net> <20021125180939.GH32010@digitalkingdom.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20021125180939.GH32010@digitalkingdom.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-archive-position: 2706
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list


--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 10:09:39AM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 10:08:35AM -0600, Jordan DeLong wrote:
[...]
> > It's equivalent after the respondant provides a predicate, though.
> > (They have to provide the same predicate for both people (or at
> > least that's what they're being asked for)).
>=20
> They are?  But the two mo are in two different sentences.

This would be why I said after the respondent provides a predicate.
So there's no mo's in the expanded sentence:

  A: mi .e do mo
  B: klama

then "mi klama .ije do klama" is the expansion.  You can't do it
before getting an answer, as it would then ask two questions.  Though
I suppose something along the lines of
    mi .e do mo =3D=3D su'o bu'a goi ma zo'u mi bu'a .ije do bu'a
probably would work.

Also, "Foo .ije Bar" is one sentence (or 'statement').

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
                                     sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE94sifDrrilS51AZ8RAmijAKCQPUK9eWdGHgJ1GenqdSZe8PH6ZACeL8PK
ClWj2qQ3m0eAzqyhotqprk0=
=L0ig
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI--