From fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com Mon Nov 25 17:18:28 2002
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 25 Nov 2002 17:18:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 18GUMq-0004TN-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 17:18:24 -0800
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id gAQ1PwWF071960
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 19:25:58 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
	by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id gAQ1PwSI071959
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 19:25:58 -0600 (CST)
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 19:25:58 -0600
From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Is .e == .ije?
Message-ID: <20021126012558.GA71814@allusion.net>
References: <001901c294a7$68b5f640$0300a8c0@avitallap> <3DE20F4B.3060000@bilkent.edu.tr> <20021125160835.GA69822@allusion.net> <20021125180939.GH32010@digitalkingdom.org> <20021126010431.GA71193@allusion.net> <3DE2CB40.4010709@bilkent.edu.tr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3DE2CB40.4010709@bilkent.edu.tr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-archive-position: 2708
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list


--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 03:15:44AM +0200, Robin Turner wrote:
> Jordan DeLong wrote:
> >Also, "Foo .ije Bar" is one sentence (or 'statement').
>=20
> But isn't it two bridi? I would have thought that was the more important=
=20
> point in assigning scope. (Apologies in advance in case I'm talking=20
> nalsmu - my Lojban grammar is even more rusty than my car).

Sure it's two bridi.  But so is {mi nelci lo'enu mi gleki}.

Each of the pair of bridi (in the .ije one) have seperate scopes,
and one prenex has scope over both of them.

The whole thing was off topic though, sorry; I shouldn't have
mentioned it, as I agree that if one expands it by simply duplicating
the `mo' its meaning changes.

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
                                     sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE94s2lDrrilS51AZ8RAgfrAKCVq53S46eaTwO9GsdmBhJqXVP0TwCgnbaT
2l3JKGagpWKa3zntJnZBESg=
=zkn0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s--