From fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com Tue Nov 26 22:18:37 2002
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 26 Nov 2002 22:18:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 18GvWs-0003je-00; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 22:18:34 -0800
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id gAR6Q9WF086052;
	Wed, 27 Nov 2002 00:26:14 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
	by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id gAR6Q9xW086051;
	Wed, 27 Nov 2002 00:26:09 -0600 (CST)
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 00:26:09 -0600
From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Cc: baselinevote@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: New poll for lojban
Message-ID: <20021127062609.GA86013@allusion.net>
References: <1038371624.541.52686.w50@yahoogroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1038371624.541.52686.w50@yahoogroups.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-archive-position: 2710
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list


--82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

[ Cc to baselinevote@lojban.org; I can't vote through yahoo, so
apparently Robin'll get this message twice ;) ]

On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 04:33:44AM -0000, lojban@yahoogroups.com wrote:
> Do you support the new Lojban baseline=20
> policy statement posted to the list and=20

[ I never saw it posted to the list... ]

> found at=20
> http://www.lojban.org/llg/baseline.html?

I vote yes, as this appears to be structured to allow clarification,
etc, with minimal impact on stability.

The various contradictions in baselined documents (and there aren't
really very many of these (contradictions or documents, heh heh),
but long-distance vo'a and such things could certainly use an
official stamp) are worth sorting out, and there are probably one
or two things worth considering for official status (mu'ei, official
statement that sumtcita quantifier scope goes from the sumti to the
tag, maybe a few other minor things), along with getting more verbose
definitions.

I'd also like to get on the mailing list for byfy stuff whenever
that gets set up.

  mu'o
--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
                                     sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE95GWBDrrilS51AZ8RAno6AKCrGvhm71T+4PUuVoKk5NSVXHMqvwCfShJu
k0o0s4nLaouX7Nb7dnSfxi8=
=+UKs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs--