From sentto-44114-17273-1038576019-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Fri Nov 29 05:20:58 2002
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 29 Nov 2002 05:20:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from n6.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.90])
	by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 18Hl4d-0001EC-00
	for lojban-in@lojban.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 05:20:51 -0800
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-17273-1038576019-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com
Received: from [66.218.67.193] by n6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Nov 2002 13:20:20 -0000
X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 29 Nov 2002 13:20:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 57373 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2002 13:20:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Nov 2002 13:20:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Nov 2002 13:20:18 -0000
Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id 773613C705; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 08:20:09 -0500 (EST)
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20021128140213.031df040@pop.east.cox.net> <5.1.0.14.0.20021129015947.03165ec0@pop.east.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20021129015947.03165ec0@pop.east.cox.net>
X-Spamtrap: fesmri@ixazon.dynip.com
Message-Id: <0211290820000G.02982@neofelis>
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 08:20:00 -0500
Subject: [lojban] Re: [llg-members] Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-archive-position: 2760
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On Friday 29 November 2002 02:07, Robert LeChevalier wrote:
> At 03:42 PM 11/28/02 -0500, Pierre wrote:
> >Can you point me to the criteria that make {srutio}, {letcue}, and (I
> >remembered the other one) {damskrima} invalid? As far as I can tell from
> > the specification in the refgram, they are valid.
>
> The first two are lujvo.  Under the TLI alternate orthography, the
> apostrophe can be omitted in V'V unless the associated VV is a standard
> diphthong.
>
> But if in fact you think that they are allowed by the refgrammar, why would
> you be asking for a change to the spec?

I don't use the TLI alternate orthography, so when I write {srutio}, I don't 
mean {sruti'o}. But there is a word which jbofi'e accepts and which has one 
of those diphthongs: {ckankua}. If this is in fact invalid, then jbofi'e has 
a bug.

phma

To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/