From sentto-44114-17276-1038581948-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Fri Nov 29 06:59:52 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 29 Nov 2002 06:59:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from n21.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.77]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 18HmcF-0002Rg-00 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 06:59:39 -0800 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-17276-1038581948-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.66.98] by n21.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Nov 2002 14:59:08 -0000 X-Sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 29 Nov 2002 14:59:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 50018 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2002 14:59:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Nov 2002 14:59:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lmsmtp01.st1.spray.net) (212.78.202.111) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Nov 2002 14:59:06 -0000 Received: from oemcomputer (host81-7-62-201.surfport24.v21.co.uk [81.7.62.201]) by lmsmtp01.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B3A1E7A2 for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 15:59:04 +0100 (MET) To: Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Importance: Normal From: "And Rosta" X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 15:01:12 -0000 Subject: [lojban] afterthought prenexes (was: RE: Re: The "Vote for Nick" platform Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 2763 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Nick: > (Damn. I wish we had afterthought prenexes. See {zo'au} on the wiki page called "Experimental anaphorics", which improves matters a bit, though I think true afterthought scope is impossible; the best one could have is a marker that means "glork the scope of the following word from context, not from its position in the sentence structure". --And. To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/