From sentto-44114-17281-1038607529-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Fri Nov 29 14:06:08 2002
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 29 Nov 2002 14:06:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from n27.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.83])
	by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 18HtGr-0006K5-01
	for lojban-in@lojban.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 14:06:01 -0800
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-17281-1038607529-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com
Received: from [66.218.67.200] by n27.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Nov 2002 22:05:30 -0000
X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 29 Nov 2002 22:05:29 -0000
Received: (qmail 66240 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2002 22:05:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Nov 2002 22:05:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Nov 2002 22:05:28 -0000
Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id 82F843C5DA; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 17:05:27 -0500 (EST)
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20021129015947.03165ec0@pop.east.cox.net> <5.1.0.14.0.20021129125713.00abb680@pop.east.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20021129125713.00abb680@pop.east.cox.net>
X-Spamtrap: fesmri@ixazon.dynip.com
Message-Id: <0211291705250N.02982@neofelis>
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 17:05:25 -0500
Subject: [lojban] Fu'ivla diphthongs was: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-archive-position: 2768
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On Friday 29 November 2002 13:01, Robert LeChevalier wrote:
> At 08:20 AM 11/29/02 -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> >I don't use the TLI alternate orthography, so when I write {srutio}, I
> > don't mean {sruti'o}.
>
> But if srutio is a valid word, then it has to be usable by those who DO you
> the alternate orthography.
>
> >But there is a word which jbofi'e accepts and which has one
> >of those diphthongs: {ckankua}. If this is in fact invalid, then jbofi'e
> > has a bug.
>
> 1. jbofi'e is not an official LLG standard.
> 2. ckankua fails the slinku'i test

Okay, I've found in chapter 4 of the Book the word {kuarka}, and its type-3 
version {saskrkuarka}, which it claims are valid fu'ivla. If indeed {ua} 
cannot occur in fu'ivla, as it cannot in lujvo, then this has to be either 
{ku'arka} or {ku,arka}. Which is it?

phma

To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/