From sentto-44114-17306-1038675839-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Sat Nov 30 09:04:37 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 30 Nov 2002 09:04:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from n11.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.66]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 18IB2c-0005z7-01 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 09:04:31 -0800 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-17306-1038675839-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.200] by n11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Nov 2002 17:03:59 -0000 X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 30 Nov 2002 17:03:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 58372 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2002 17:03:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 30 Nov 2002 17:03:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.240) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Nov 2002 17:03:56 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 09:03:56 -0800 Received: from 200.69.6.3 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 17:03:55 GMT To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Nov 2002 17:03:56.0065 (UTC) FILETIME=[77B2D110:01C29892] From: "Jorge Llambias" X-Originating-IP: [200.69.6.3] X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 17:03:55 +0000 Subject: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 2793 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list la lojbab cusku di'e >If this policy is voted down, then [...] there likely will be no byfy (Nick >accepted the job >conditional on a mandate of approval for the policy), If the question was whether or not to give Nick a vote of confidence for the leadership of the byfy project, then my vote would be YES without any doubts. If the question is whether one agrees with every detail spelled out in the policy, my vote would be NO. I disagree with some things in there, mostly those things that have to do with freezes and official seals of approval. Since the two questions seem to be unnecessarily conflated, I will abstain. I'm confident anyway that the policy will be approved by an overwhelming majority and so my not voting will not risk leaving Nick without a mandate. It will however reduce the tally of "Lojbanists interested enough in Lojban to vote on this issue". mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/