From xod@thestonecutters.net Mon Dec 02 06:54:35 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 02 Dec 2002 06:54:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from [66.111.194.10] (helo=granite.thestonecutters.net) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Irxo-00050R-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 06:54:24 -0800 Received: from localhost (xod@localhost) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gB2Ers957513 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 09:53:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 09:53:54 -0500 (EST) From: Invent Yourself To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Progress In-Reply-To: <009001c29a03$3b659e50$3202a8c0@mauve> Message-ID: <20021202095253.V57466-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 2878 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, David Barton wrote: > In the midst of controversy, I can't help but share a little buzz: the > first time my "under control" list is bigger than the "New Word" list on > Logflash. Little things mean a lot. Yes, I'm trying again to do this. > Perhaps I'll start contributing to the Lojban discussion this time. > (After the gismus, I get to tackle the cmavos, which are *much* harder > for me). Congratulations! I look forward to seeing your contributions. -- Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.