From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Mon Dec 02 12:51:56 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 02 Dec 2002 12:51:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18IxXk-0002F4-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 12:51:52 -0800 Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 12:51:52 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy Message-ID: <20021202205152.GH1520@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <5.1.0.14.0.20021127233445.03073ec0@pop.east.cox.net> <20021202205014.GG1520@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021202205014.GG1520@digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 2898 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:50:14PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 11:44:41PM -0000, And Rosta wrote: > > Lojbab: > > > The policy is not up for a debate - only ratification or rejection. > > [...] > > > But the policy is not open to amendment at this point > > > > For this very reason, I will vote against it, even though I agree with > > the great majority of it. > > > > I hope other people will vote against for the same reason, even if > > they support the policy. > > Not a hope in hell. > > Just for the record. > > Fractionalization pisses me off. *Fac*tionalization, rather. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u jmaji le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi