From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Mon Dec 02 20:05:40 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 02 Dec 2002 20:05:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18J4JV-0005GE-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 20:05:37 -0800 Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 20:05:37 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: constitutional amendability (was: RE: Re: Official Statement- LLG Board approves newbaseline policy Message-ID: <20021203040537.GT1558@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20021202230857.GR1520@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 2947 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 03:38:47AM -0000, And Rosta wrote: > I'm not sure if it's LLG policy or the internals of the baseline that > are being talked about here. Ummm, what do you think the baseline *IS*? It's an LLG policy. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u jmaji le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi