From raganok@intrex.net Wed Dec 04 16:05:58 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 04 Dec 2002 16:05:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.intrex.net ([209.42.192.250]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18JjWc-0006CM-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 16:05:54 -0800 Received: from Craig [209.42.200.67] by smtp.intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id A841834024E; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 19:05:21 -0500 From: "Craig" To: Subject: [lojban] Re: Loglan Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 19:05:33 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal X-Declude-Sender: raganok@intrex.net [209.42.200.67] X-Note: Total weight is 0. Whitelisted X-archive-position: 3023 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: raganok@intrex.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list >>> McIvor is not on the BPFK, is he? Why not invite him? >> >> Bob expressly wants to invite him. I didn't, and if he is invited, >> as far as I'm concerned, he's invited as a Lojbanist (or at the >> least, as someone with expertise in Logical Language), not as a >> Loglanist. > I received an informal invitation to participate, but having read >all the correspondence to this point, I see no point in doing so. I must say, I am extremely dissappointed. Not that anyone chooses not to be on the bypyfyk, but that we have driven away a person who has expressed some interest in the language.