From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Wed Dec 04 16:50:34 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 04 Dec 2002 16:50:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from lmsmtp01.st1.spray.net ([212.78.202.111]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18JkDl-0006ZT-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 16:50:29 -0800 Received: from oemcomputer (host213-121-69-185.surfport24.v21.co.uk [213.121.69.185]) by lmsmtp01.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66311EA25; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 01:49:56 +0100 (MET) From: "And Rosta" To: , Subject: [lojban] Re: Loglan Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 00:52:06 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Importance: Normal X-archive-position: 3025 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Bob McIvor: > Most newcomers to TLI have looked at both languages before deciding > to go with TLI I'm curious as to what their reasons were. Do you know? (I found Loglan (word lists) shortly before Lojban. I never really made a conscious choice between them, but Lojban had a lively net community and Loglan didn't, so I gradually became part of Lojban. I still think that that's the main substantive criterion for choosing between the two.) --And.