From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Wed Dec 04 16:55:41 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 04 Dec 2002 16:55:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18JkIj-0006cK-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 16:55:37 -0800 Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 16:55:37 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Loglan Message-ID: <20021205005537.GL22111@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 3026 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 12:52:06AM -0000, And Rosta wrote: > Bob McIvor: > > Most newcomers to TLI have looked at both languages before deciding > > to go with TLI > > I'm curious as to what their reasons were. Do you know? > > (I found Loglan (word lists) shortly before Lojban. I never really > made a conscious choice between them, I, on the other hand, did make a concious choice. I was actually canvassing all sources I could find for a logical language. The *instant* I discovered that Loglan was copywritten, I dropped it in favour of lojban. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u jmaji le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi