From sentto-44114-17554-1039058374-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Wed Dec 04 23:59:16 2002
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 04 Dec 2002 23:59:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from n10.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.65])
	by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 18Jquf-0001JS-00
	for lojban-in@lojban.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 23:59:13 -0800
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-17554-1039058374-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com
Received: from [66.218.67.200] by n10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Dec 2002 03:19:34 -0000
X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 5 Dec 2002 03:19:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 6540 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2002 03:19:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 5 Dec 2002 03:19:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Dec 2002 03:19:32 -0000
Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id 346993C48C; Wed,  4 Dec 2002 22:19:30 -0500 (EST)
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <02120414202304.01986@neofelis>
In-Reply-To: <02120414202304.01986@neofelis>
X-Spamtrap: fesmri@ixazon.dynip.com
Message-Id: <02120422192809.01986@neofelis>
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 22:19:28 -0500
Subject: [lojban] Re: cmegadri valfendi preti
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-archive-position: 3057
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On Wednesday 04 December 2002 14:20, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> Another question: why is the cmegadri broken off from what precedes it,
> instead of just breaking between the cmene and the cmegadri and leaving the
> cmegadri to be found later? What about {MUstelaVIson} and {muSTElaVIson}?
> How should they be analyzed?

More weasel words: {MUstela.Albipes} and {muSTEla.Albipes}. (I made that up. 
There is a nigripes.)

The weasel cage at Bertcad Mivdal has five locks. It seems that with any 
fewer, the weasels are clever enough to open them.

phma

To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/