From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Thu Dec 05 07:02:44 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 05 Dec 2002 07:02:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from com1.uclan.ac.uk ([193.61.255.3]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18JxWK-0004xj-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2002 07:02:32 -0800 Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer); Thu, 5 Dec 2002 14:27:12 +0000 Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 05 Dec 2002 15:02:08 +0000 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2 Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 15:01:41 +0000 From: And Rosta To: rmcivor , jcowan Cc: lojban-list Subject: [lojban] Re: Loglan Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline X-archive-position: 3071 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list >>> John Cowan 12/05/02 03:10am >>> #Robert McIvor scripsit: #> As #> for the membership list, would LLG provide TLI with their membership #> list so we could attempt to poach their members? I think not. # #Actually, I would be happy to see us hand over our mailing list, #lock, stock, and barrel to TLI. You could hardly make more of a mess #of it than we have. I presume the subtext is "because I hope that you will reduce some of its chaos" rather than "because it is a poisoned chalice, and doomed is he who tries to maintain it". --And.