From sentto-44114-17605-1039143375-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Thu Dec 05 22:44:05 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 05 Dec 2002 22:44:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from n11.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.66]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 18KCDR-0006lq-01 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2002 22:44:01 -0800 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-17605-1039143375-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.200] by n11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Dec 2002 02:56:15 -0000 X-Sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 6 Dec 2002 02:56:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 56946 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2002 02:56:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 6 Dec 2002 02:56:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lmsmtp03.st1.spray.net) (212.78.202.113) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Dec 2002 02:56:14 -0000 Received: from oemcomputer (host81-7-59-212.surfport24.v21.co.uk [81.7.59.212]) by lmsmtp03.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FAFB3D09C for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 03:56:12 +0100 (MET) To: "Lojban@Yahoogroups. Com" Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Importance: Normal From: "And Rosta" X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 02:58:23 -0000 Subject: [lojban] Re: Loglan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-archive-position: 3117 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Bob McIvor: > On Mercredi, déce 4, 2002, at 19:52 US/Eastern, And Rosta wrote: > > > Bob McIvor: > >> Most newcomers to TLI have looked at both languages before deciding > >> to go with TLI > > > > I'm curious as to what their reasons were. Do you know? > > One commonly expressed reason is the appearance of the written > language. Another is the proliferation of cmavo > whose semantics and usage, are constantly debated Is this because fewer people are around to debate Loglan cmavo, or because debate happens behind closed doors, or because the semantics and usage of Loglan cmavo is more settled? If Loglan is more settled, how was that achieved? And do you think that BF should consult Loglan solutions for insights? --And. To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/