From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Fri Dec 06 11:25:51 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 06 Dec 2002 11:25:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18KO6c-0000m7-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2002 11:25:46 -0800 Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 11:25:46 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Aesthetics Message-ID: <20021206192546.GI28980@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 3151 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 03:34:27PM +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote: > la nitcion cusku di'e > >Yes, I can work out Lojban written without dots. But why is your > >lojban so cool as to merit the extra headache? > > Once you accept that it makes no difference, you don't even notice > which style you're reading and the headaches go away. Please do not speak for others in that fashion. I assure you, you are not correct in my case; my visual processing abilities are, at best, sub-par, and not having .i to search for makes reading lojban *much* harder for me. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u jmaji le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi