From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Fri Dec 06 16:47:47 2002
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 06 Dec 2002 16:47:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lmsmtp03.st1.spray.net ([212.78.202.113])
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 18KT89-0005EH-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2002 16:47:42 -0800
Received: from oemcomputer (host81-7-63-172.surfport24.v21.co.uk [81.7.63.172])
	by lmsmtp03.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51BB83CFFD
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sat,  7 Dec 2002 01:47:10 +0100 (MET)
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
To: <lojban-list@lojban.org>
Subject: [lojban] Re: Old questions, still unanswered.. 
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 00:49:20 -0000
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMKEPCHAAA.a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <000001c29d65$39b81be0$0300a8c0@avitallap>
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Importance: Normal
X-archive-position: 3176
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

Avital:
> a) Is "ko'a broda je brode" equivelant to "ko'a broda gi'e brode"?

Yes, I think.

> b) Is "ko'a broda je brode" more semantically amgiuous than "ko'a broda 
> gi'e brode"?

No, I think.

> c) Is "ko'a broda je brode" less semantically ambiguous than "ko'a broda
> brode"?

Yes.

> d) Is <lo'e barda manti cu barda> true?

It depends on what the selbri {barda manti} means. Until that is
determined, the truth can't be evaluated.

> e) Is <lo barda manti cu barda> true?

Same answer as for (d), viz "not necessarily".

--And.